Cited by 117Child Development and Digital TechnologyImpact of Technology on AdolescentsPhysical Activity and Health

Sociodemographic Correlates of Contemporary Screen Time Use among 9- and 10-Year-Old Children

Open access
Nagata, Jason M., Ganson, Kyle T., Iyer, Puja, Chu, Jonathan, Baker, Fiona C., Pettee Gabriel, Kelley, Garber, Andrea K., Murray, Stuart B. +1 more·2022·The Journal of Pediatrics

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine sociodemographic correlates of contemporary screen time use among a diverse population-based sample of 9- and 10-year-old children. STUDY DESIGN: In 2021, we analyzed cross-sectional baseline (2016-2018) data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study (n = 10 755). Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to estimate associations between sociodemographic factors (sex, race/ethnicity, country of birth, household income, parental education) and 6 contemporary forms of screen time (television, videos [eg, YouTube], video games, social networking, texting, and video chat). RESULTS: On average, children reported 3.99 hours of screen time per day across 6 modalities, with the most time spent watching/streaming television shows/movies (1.31 hours), playing video games (1.06 hours), and watching/streaming videos (1.05 hours). On average, Black children reported 1.58 more hours of screen time per day and Asian children reported 0.35 less hours of screen time per day compared with White children (mean 3.46 hours per day), and these trends persisted across most modalities. Boys reported higher overall screen time (0.75 hours more) than girls, which was primarily attributed to video games and videos. Girls reported more time texting, social networking, and video chatting than boys. Higher income was associated with lower screen time usage across all modalities except video chat. However, in high-income households, Latinx children reported 0.65 more hours of screen time per day than White children. CONCLUSIONS: Given the sociodemographic differences in child screen use, guideline implementation strategies can focus on key populations, encourage targeted counseling by pediatricians, and adapt Family Media Use Plans for diverse backgrounds.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.08.077

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The same ABCD analysis found that male adolescents reported higher overall screen time than female adolescents, while female adolescents reported higher daily use of social networking, texting, and video chatting.

    “The same analysis found that, while male adolescents reported higher overall screen time than female adolescents, female adolescents reported higher daily use of social networking, texting, and video chatting [77].”
  • Data from the ABCD Study showed that, compared to White adolescents, Black adolescents reported greater total screen time use and Asian adolescents reported lower screen time use.

    “For instance, data from the ABCD Study showed that, compared to White adolescents, Black adolescents reported greater total screen time use and Asian adolescents reported lower screen time use [77].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [17]American Academy of Pediatrics. New research on media use informs discussion on digital recommendations. AAP News 2015; 36: 30– 30.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nagata, J. M., Ganson, K. T., Iyer, P., Chu, J., Baker, F. C., Pettee Gabriel, K., Garber, A. K., Murray, S. B., & Bibbins-Domingo, K.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • SRI International (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Nagata, Jason M.
Venue
The Journal of Pediatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
240
Pages
213-220.e2
ISSN
0022-3476 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3198370127
Cited by
117
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2
FWCI
23.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (K23 MH115184, K24DK103992, U01DA041022, U01DA041025, U01DA041028, U01DA041048, U01DA041089, U01DA041093, U01DA041106, U01DA041117, U01DA041120, U01DA041134, U01DA041148, U01DA041156, U01DA041174, U24DA041123, U24DA041147)
  • National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (K08HL159350)
  • American Heart Association (CDA34760281)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
screen time, children, sociodemographic factors, television viewing, video games, social media use, text messaging, video chat, racial and ethnic disparities, household income, parental education, sex differences, Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study, pediatric counseling
MeSH terms
Screen Time, Adolescent, Child, Child Behavior, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Socioeconomic Factors, Television, Video Games, Self Report, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review