Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 162

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Digital micromirror device projection printing system for meniscus tissue engineering

Open access
Grogan, Shawn P., Chung, Peter H., Soman, Pranav, Chen, Peter, Lotz, Martin K., Chen, Shaochen, D’Lima, Darryl D.·2013·Acta Biomaterialia

Abstract

Meniscus degeneration due to age or injury can lead to osteoarthritis. Though promising, current cell-based approaches show limited success. Here we present three-dimensional methacrylated gelatin (GelMA) scaffolds patterned via projection stereolithography to emulate the circumferential alignment of cells in native meniscus tissue. Cultured human avascular zone meniscus cells from normal meniscus were seeded on the scaffolds. Cell viability was monitored, and neo-tissue formation was assessed by gene expression analysis and histology after two weeks in serum free culture with TGFβ1 (10ng/ml). Light, confocal and scanning electron microscopy was used to observe cell/GelMA interactions. Tensile mechanical testing was performed on unseeded, fresh scaffolds and two-week old cell-seeded and unseeded scaffolds. Two-week old cell/GelMA constructs were implanted into surgically created meniscus defects in an explant organ culture model. No cytotoxic effects were observed three weeks after implantation, and cells grew and aligned to the patterned GelMA strands. Gene expression profiles and histology indicated promotion of a fibrocartilage-like meniscus phenotype, and scaffold integration with repair tissue was observed in the explant model. We show that micropatterned GelMA scaffolds are non-toxic, produce organized cellular alignment, and promote meniscus-like tissue formation. Prefabrication of GelMA scaffolds with architectures mimicking meniscus collagen bundle organization shows promise for meniscal repair. Furthermore, the technique presented may be scaled to repair larger defects.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.03.020

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 162

Metadata

Authors
Grogan, S. P., Chung, P. H., Soman, P., Chen, P., Lotz, M. K., Chen, S., & D’Lima, D. D.
Venue
Acta Biomaterialia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
9
Issue
7
Pages
7218-7226
ISSN
1742-7061 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2145605242
Cited by
162
References
3
FWCI
5.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Digital micromirror device projection printing system for meniscus tissue engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.03.020
The paper
Grogan, S. P., Chung, P. H., Soman, P., Chen, P., Lotz, M. K., Chen, S., & D’Lima, D. D. (2013). Digital micromirror device projection printing system for meniscus tissue engineering. Acta Biomaterialia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.03.020

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.