The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Zinc-based alloys for degradable vascular stent applications
Open accessAbstract
The search for biodegradable metals with mechanical properties equal or higher to those of currently used permanent biomaterials, such as stainless steels, cobalt chromium and titanium alloys, desirable in vivo degradation rate and uniform corrosion is still an open challenge. Magnesium (Mg), iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn)-based alloys have been proposed as biodegradable metals for medical applications. Over the last two decades, extensive research has been done on Mg and Fe. Fe-based alloys show appropriate mechanical properties, but their degradation rate is an order of magnitude below the benchmark value. In comparison, alongside the insufficient mechanical performance of most of its alloys, Mg degradation rate has proven to be too high in a physiological environment and corrosion is rarely uniform. During the last few years, Zn alloys have been explored by the biomedical community as potential materials for bioabsorbable vascular stents due to their tolerable corrosion rates and tunable mechanical properties. This review summarizes recent progress made in developing Zn alloys for vascular stenting application. Novel Zn alloys are discussed regarding their microstructural characteristics, mechanical properties, corrosion behavior and in vivo performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Trumbo, P., Schlicker, S., Yates, A. A., & Poos, M. (2002) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/s0002-8223(02)90346-9 · Cited by 5,993
Toxicity of lithium to humans and the environment—A literature review
Aral, H., & Vecchio-Sadus, A. (2008) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2008.02.026 · Cited by 546
Long-term surveillance of zinc implant in murine artery: Surprisingly steady biocorrosion rate
Drelich, A. J., Zhao, S., Guillory, R. J., Drelich, J. W., & Goldman, J. (2017) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2017.05.045 · Cited by 188
Self-citation
Cited by
Zinc-based biomaterials for regeneration and therapy
Su, Y., Cockerill, I., Wang, Y., Qin, Y.-X., Chang, L., Zheng, Y., & Zhu, D. (2019) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.10.009 · Cited by 417
Additive manufacturing of biodegradable metals: Current research status and future perspectives
Qin, Y., Wen, P., Guo, H., Xia, D., Zheng, Y., Jauer, L., Poprawe, R., Voshage, M., & Schleifenbaum, J. H. (2019) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2019.04.046 · Cited by 303
Mei, D., Lamaka, S. V., Lu, X., & Zheludkevich, M. L. (2020) · Corrosion Science · doi:10.1016/j.corsci.2020.108722 · Cited by 284
Biodegradable magnesium‐based biomaterials: An overview of challenges and opportunities
Amukarimi, S., & Mozafari, M. (2021) · MedComm · doi:10.1002/mco2.59 · Cited by 258
In vitro and in vivo studies of Zn-Mn biodegradable metals designed for orthopedic applications
Jia, B., Yang, H., Han, Y., Zhang, Z., Qu, X., Zhuang, Y., Wu, Q., Zheng, Y., & Dai, K. (2020) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2020.03.009 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Mostaed, E., Sikora-Jasinska, M., Drelich, J. W., & Vedani, M.
- Venue
- Acta Biomaterialia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-04
- Volume
- 71
- Pages
- 1-23
- ISSN
- 1742-7061 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2790284808
- Cited by
- 565
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Zinc-based alloys for degradable vascular stent applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.03.005
- The paper
- Mostaed, E., Sikora-Jasinska, M., Drelich, J. W., & Vedani, M. (2018). Zinc-based alloys for degradable vascular stent applications. Acta Biomaterialia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.03.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.