Cited by 65Visual perception and processing mechanismsCognitive Abilities and TestingVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

Video game experience and its influence on visual attention parameters: An investigation using the framework of the Theory of Visual Attention (TVA)

Schubert, Torsten, Finke, Kathrin, Redel, Petra, Kluckow, Steffen, Müller, Hermann, Strobach, Tilo·2015·Acta Psychologica

Abstract

Experts with video game experience, in contrast to non-experienced persons, are superior in multiple domains of visual attention. However, it is an open question which basic aspects of attention underlie this superiority. We approached this question using the framework of Theory of Visual Attention (TVA) with tools that allowed us to assess various parameters that are related to different visual attention aspects (e.g., perception threshold, processing speed, visual short-term memory storage capacity, top-down control, spatial distribution of attention) and that are measurable on the same experimental basis. In Experiment 1, we found advantages of video game experts in perception threshold and visual processing speed; the latter being restricted to the lower positions of the used computer display. The observed advantages were not significantly moderated by general person-related characteristics such as personality traits, sensation seeking, intelligence, social anxiety, or health status. Experiment 2 tested a potential causal link between the expert advantages and video game practice with an intervention protocol. It found no effects of action video gaming on perception threshold, visual short-term memory storage capacity, iconic memory storage, top-down control, and spatial distribution of attention after 15 days of training. However, observations of a selected improvement of processing speed at the lower positions of the computer screen after video game training and of retest effects are suggestive for limited possibilities to improve basic aspects of visual attention (TVA) with practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.03.005

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Expert video gamers show advantages in visual attention compared to non-experts, especially in perception threshold and visual processing speed.

    “Schubert et al. [17] found advantages in visual attention in expert video gamers compared to non-experts, especially in the domains of perception threshold and visual processing speed.”
  • The advantages in visual attention found in expert video gamers were not moderated by personal characteristics such as personality, intelligence, or health status.

    “These effects were not moderated by personal characteristics such as personality, intelligence, or health status.”
  • This finding is in line with the study by Schubert et al. [17], who found differences in visual attention and visual processing speed between expert video gamers and non-experts.

    “This finding is in line with the study by Schubert et al. [17], who found differences in visual attention and visual processing speed between expert video gamers and non-experts.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 79 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schubert, T., Finke, K., Redel, P., Kluckow, S., Müller, H., & Strobach, T.
Affiliations
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • Bielefeld University (DE)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Corresponding author
Schubert, Torsten
Venue
Acta Psychologica
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
157
Pages
200-214
ISSN
0001-6918 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068061546
Cited by
65
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
FWCI
4.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Psychologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
video game experience, visual attention, Theory of Visual Attention, perception threshold, visual processing speed, visual short-term memory, iconic memory, top-down control, spatial distribution of attention, video game training, retest effects, sensation seeking, personality traits
MeSH terms
Attention, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Memory, Short-Term, Photic Stimulation, Visual Perception, Video Games, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review