CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 229Impact of Technology on AdolescentsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingGambling Behavior and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Time invariance of three ultra-brief internet-related instruments: Smartphone Application-Based Addiction Scale (SABAS), Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale (BSMAS), and the nine-item Internet Gaming Disorder Scale- Short Form (IGDS-SF9) (Study Part B)

Chen, I-Hua, Strong, Carol, Lin, Yi-Ching, Tsai, Meng-Che, Leung, Hildie, Lin, Chung-Ying, Pakpour, Amir H., Griffiths, Mark D.·2020·Addictive Behaviors
DOI 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.04.018
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Given the many technological advances over the past two decades, a small minority of young people are at risk of problematic use or becoming addicted to these technologies (including activities on the internet and smartphones). Many brief psychometric scales have been developed to assess those at risk of problematic use or addiction including the six-item Smartphone Application-Based Addiction Scale [SABAS], the six-item Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale [BSMAS], and the nine-item Internet Gaming Disorder Scale-Short Form [IGDS-SF9]). However, to date, the reproducibility of these three scales has only been examined over a short period of time (e.g., two weeks), and it is unclear whether they are time invariant across a longer period (e.g., three months). Given the emergence of internet and smartphone addiction in Chinese population, the present study translated the three instruments into Chinese and recruited 640 university students (304 from Hong Kong [99 males] and 336 from Taiwan [167 males]) to complete the three scales twice (baseline and three months after baseline). Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA) was applied to examine the time invariance. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the relative reliability, and the percentage of smallest real difference (SRD%) was utilized to explore the absolute reliability for the three scales. MGCFA showed that all three scales were time invariant across three months. ICC demonstrated that all the scales were satisfactory in reproducibility (0.82 to 0.94), and SRD% indicated that all the scales had acceptable measurement noise (23.8 to 29.4). In conclusion, the short, valid, reliable, and easy-to-use Chinese SABAS, BSMAS, and IGDS-SF9 show good properties across periods of three months.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.04.018

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 63 references

1 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Arıcak, 2018, Adapting the Short Form of the Internet Gaming Disorder Scale into Turkish: Validity and reliability, Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions
  2. Csibi, 2016, Hungarian adaptation and psychometric characteristics of Brief Addiction to Smartphone Scale (BASS) [in Hungarian], Psychiatria Hungarica, 31, 71
  3. Leung, 2019, Addictive Behaviors
  4. de Palo, 2018, Measurement invariance of the nine-item Internet Gaming Disorder Scale across Albania, United States of America, United Kingdom, and Italy, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 229

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Chen, I.-H., Strong, C., Lin, Y.-C., Tsai, M.-C., Leung, H., Lin, C.-Y., Pakpour, A. H., & Griffiths, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Qufu Normal University (CN)
  • National Cheng Kung University Hospital (TW)
  • National Taipei University of Education (TW)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • Qazvin University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Nottingham Trent University (GB)
Corresponding author
Lin, Chung-Ying
ORCID
Venue
Addictive Behaviors
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
101
Pages
105960
ISSN
0306-4603 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.04.018
OpenAlex
W2937637483
Cited by
229
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 16
FWCI
41.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Addictive Behaviors (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
Keywords
time invariance, internet addiction, smartphone addiction, social media addiction, gaming disorder, Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale, Chinese translation, psychometric properties, university students, Hong Kong, Taiwan
MeSH terms
Internet Addiction Disorder, Adult, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Hong Kong, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Students, Taiwan, Time, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review