Cited by 46

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

People Are Not Becoming 'AIholic': Questioning the 'ChatGPT Addiction' Construct

Ciudad-Fernández, Víctor, von Hammerstein, Cora, Billieux, Joël·2025·Addictive Behaviors

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.addbeh.2025.108325

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Ballou, 2021, The relationship between mental well-being and dysregulated gaming: A specification curve analysis of core and peripheral criteria in five gaming disorder scales, Royal Society Open Science, 8, 10.1098/rsos.201385 · DOI
  2. Billieux, 2017, Behavioural Addiction Open Definition 2.0—Using the Open Science Framework for collaborative and transparent theoretical development, Addiction, 112, 1723, 10.1111/add.13938 · DOI
  3. Brand, 2022, Which conditions should be considered as disorders in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) designation of “other specified disorders due to addictive behaviors”?, Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 11, 150
  4. Castro-Calvo, 2021, Expert appraisal of criteria for assessing gaming disorder: An international Delphi study, Addiction, 116, 2463, 10.1111/add.15411 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Flayelle, 2022, The advantages and downsides of online focus groups for conducting research on addictive online behaviours, Addiction, 117, 2142, 10.1111/add.15944 · DOI
  6. Fournier, 2023, Deconstructing the components model of addiction: An illustration through “addictive” use of social media, Addictive Behaviors, 143, 10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107694 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Gruenberg, 1935, Radio and the child, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 177, 123, 10.1177/000271623517700118 · DOI
  8. Katz, A., Shakir, U., & Chambers, B. (2023). The Utility of Large Language Models and Generative AI for Education Research (Version 1). arXiv. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2305.18125. · DOI
  9. Lin, 2024, ChatGPT Addiction: A Proposed Phenomenon of Dual Parasocial Interaction, Taiwanese Journal of Psychiatry, 38, 153, 10.4103/TPSY.TPSY_28_24 · DOI
  10. Meerloo, J.A.M. (1954). Television addiction and reactive apathy. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 120(3). 290-291.https://journals.lww.com/jonmd/fulltext/1954/09000/television_addiction_and_reactive_apathy.18.aspx. · DOI
  11. Orben, 2020, The Sisyphean Cycle of Technology Panics, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15, 1143, 10.1177/1745691620919372 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Orrù, 2023, Human-like problem-solving abilities in large language models using ChatGPT, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 6, 10.3389/frai.2023.1199350 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Satchell, 2021, Development of an Offline-Friend Addiction Questionnaire (O-FAQ): Are most people really social addicts?, Behavior Research Methods, 53, 1097, 10.3758/s13428-020-01462-9 · DOI
  14. Starcevic, 2016, Tolerance and withdrawal symptoms may not be helpful to enhance understanding of behavioural addictions, Addiction, 111, 1307, 10.1111/add.13381 · DOI
  15. Starcevic, 2018, Selfitis, selfie addiction, Twitteritis: Irresistible appeal of medical terminology for problematic behaviours in the digital age, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 52, 408, 10.1177/0004867418763532 · DOI
  16. Salah, M., Abdelfattah, F., Alhalbusi, H., & Mukhaini, M.A. (2024). Me and My AI Bot: Exploring the “AIholic” Phenomenon and University Students’ Dependency on Generative AI Chatbots - Is This the New Academic Addiction? [Preprint]. Research Square. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3508563/v2. · DOI
  17. Xie, 2023, Friend, mentor, lover: Does chatbot engagement lead to psychological dependence?, Journal of Service Management, 34, 806, 10.1108/JOSM-02-2022-0072 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Yankouskaya, 2024, ChatGPT Addiction: From Support to Dependence in AI Large Language Models, SSRN
  19. Young, 1998, Internet Addiction: The Emergence of a New Clinical Disorder, CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1, 237, 10.1089/cpb.1998.1.237 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Yu, 2024, Development and validation the Problematic ChatGPT Use Scale: A preliminary report, Current Psychology, 43, 26080, 10.1007/s12144-024-06259-z · DOI
  21. Zhang, 2024, Do you have AI dependency? The roles of academic self-efficacy, academic stress, and performance expectations on problematic AI usage behavior, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, 34, 10.1186/s41239-024-00467-0 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Zhou, 2024, Examining generative AI user addiction from a C-A-C perspective, Technology in Society, 78, 10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102653 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 46

Metadata

Authors
Ciudad-Fernández, V., von Hammerstein, C., & Billieux, J.
Venue
Addictive Behaviors
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-07
Volume
166
Pages
108325
ISSN
0306-4603
Cited by
46
References
10
Language
en
Funders
Spain Ministry of Science and Innovation (FPU21/00527)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review