Cited by 57AI in Service InteractionsSocial Robot Interaction and HRIEthics and Social Impacts of AI

The Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Dependence Scale

Zhang, Xing, Yin, Mingyue, Zhang, Mingyang, Li, Zhaoqian, Li, Hansen·2025·Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Abstract

In recent years, a plethora of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots have been developed and made available to the public. Consequently, an increasing number of individuals are integrating AI chatbots into their daily lives for various purposes. This trend has also raised concerns regarding AI chatbot dependence. However, a valid and reliable scale to assess AI chatbot dependence is yet to be developed. Therefore, this study was designed to develop and validate an AI chatbot dependence scale. We obtained initial items from previous publications and in-depth interviews. Subsequently, item analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), reliability, and validity analyses were performed to validate the AI chatbot dependence scale. Seventeen items underwent item analysis and EFA, resulting in a single-factor model with eight items explaining 58.42% of the total variance. The CFA indicated that our AI chatbot dependence scale had acceptable model fitting indices, with standardized loadings ranging between 0.50 and 0.76. In addition, this scale exhibited good reliability and validity. Thus, the current AI chatbot dependence scale can effectively evaluate individuals' dependence on AI chatbots in their daily lives.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cyber.2024.0240

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-developed measures may focus on symptoms of behavioral addiction adapted to LLM-CBs (e.g., craving, withdrawal, tolerance, loss of interests, negative impact on other aspects of life), potentially confounding emotional and functional dependence.

    “Self-developed measures may focus on symptoms of behavioral addiction adapted to LLM-CBs (e.g., craving, withdrawal, tolerance, loss of interests, negative impact on other aspects of life)103,106, potentially confounding emotional and functional dependence;”
  • Measures of AI dependence consist either of adaptations from other scales of behavioral addiction to technologies (e.g., social media, smartphone, or internet addiction) or self-developed measures.

    “Measures of “AI dependence” consist either of adaptations from other scales of behavioral addiction to technologies (e.g., social media, smartphone, or internet addiction)100–102, or self-developed measures103–106.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, X., Yin, M., Zhang, M., Li, Z., & Li, H.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Granada (ES)
  • Shanghai University of Sport (CN)
  • Jishou University (CN)
  • Sichuan Agricultural University (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Hansen
Venue
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Published
2024-11-26
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
126-131
ISSN
  • 2152-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 2152-2723
OpenAlex
W4404724208
Cited by
52
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 9
FWCI
7.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
AI chatbots, scale development, scale validation, psychological dependence, psychometric properties
MeSH terms
Generative Artificial Intelligence, Adult, Artificial Intelligence, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review