Cited by 924Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsImpact of Technology on AdolescentsSexuality, Behavior, and Technology

Are we overpathologizing everyday life? A tenable blueprint for behavioral addiction research

Open access
Billieux, Joël, Schimmenti, Adriano, Khazaal, Yasser, Maurage, Pierre, Heeren, Alexandre·2015·Journal of Behavioral Addictions

Abstract

Background: Behavioral addiction research has been particularly flourishing over the last two decades. However, recent publications have suggested that nearly all daily life activities might lead to a genuine addiction. Methods and aim: In this article, we discuss how the use of atheoretical and confirmatory research approaches may result in the identification of an unlimited list of “new” behavioral addictions. Results: Both methodological and theoretical shortcomings of these studies were discussed. Conclusions: We suggested that studies overpathologizing daily life activities are likely to prompt a dismissive appraisal of behavioral addiction research. Consequently, we proposed several roadmaps for future research in the field, centrally highlighting the need for longer tenable behavioral addiction research that shifts from a mere criteria-based approach toward an approach focusing on the psychological processes involved.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1556/2006.4.2015.009

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even when a university student rates a loss-of-control item high on a Likert scale, the answer does not necessarily have clinical relevance.

    “However, even when a university student rates this type of item high on a Likert scale, the answer does not necessarily have clinical relevance (Billieux, Schimmenti, Khazaal, Maurage, & Heeren, 2015; Kardefelt-Winther, 2015).”

    From Is smartphone addiction really an addiction? (2018) · cites this paper as Billieux, Schimmenti, Khazaal, Maurage, & Heeren, 2015

    In “How to Create New Diagnoses Based on Old Recipes?” (page not available), the paper discusses loss-of-control items and says functional impairment and stability are necessary to define a pathological condition. This supports the point that an item response alone need not establish clinical relevance, but the paper does not address high Likert-scale ratings by university students specifically. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Persons with CSBD present clinically and socially with a perception of out-of-control sexual behavior, extreme guilt over sexual gratification, and distress related to the adverse consequences of repetitive sexual behavior and/or the lack of satisfaction from it.

    “Persons with CSBD present themselves clinically and socially with a perception of out-of-control sexual behavior, extreme guilt over sexual gratification, and distress related to the adverse consequences of repetitive sexual behavior and/or the lack of satisfaction from it.”

    From Assessment and treatment of compulsive sexual behavior disorder: a sexual medicine perspective (2024) · cites this paper as [27]

    The section “Behavioral Addictions – A Plague of Our Era?” lists hyper-sexuality among behaviors described as addictions and discusses loss of control as a general addiction symptom. “Syndromes Versus Processes – Clinical Implications” acknowledges psychological distress from dysfunctional involvement in activities. Neither passage describes how people with CSBD present clinically or socially, or supports the specific claims about extreme guilt and lack of satisfaction. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Social media, as with use of many other new technologies, is overpathologized.

    “We agree that social media, as with use of many other new technologies, is overpathologized (Billieux et al., 2015).”
  • There is much controversy within the research field concerning both the possible overpathologising of everyday life and the most appropriate term for the phenomenon.

    “Whilst referring to an ‘addiction’ terminology in this paper, it needs to be noted that there is much controversy within the research field concerning both the possible overpathologising of everyday life [47,48] as well as the most appropriate term for the phenomenon.”

    From Social networking sites and addiction: Ten lessons learned (2017) · cites this paper as [47]

  • Current behavioral addiction research tends to be correlational and confirmatory in nature and is often based on population studies rather than clinical samples in which psychological impairments are observed.

    “On the one hand, current behavioral addiction research tends to be correlational and confirmatory in nature and is often based on population studies rather than clinical samples in which psychological impairments are observed [47].”

    From Social networking sites and addiction: Ten lessons learned (2017) · cites this paper as [47]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Billieux, J., Schimmenti, A., Khazaal, Y., Maurage, P., & Heeren, A.
Affiliations
  • Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (BE)
  • Università degli Studi di Enna Kore (IT)
  • University Hospital of Geneva (CH)
  • UCLouvain (BE)
Corresponding author
Billieux, Joël
Venue
Journal of Behavioral Addictions
Published
2015-09
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
119-123
ISSN
2062-5871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2154480079
Cited by
920
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 96 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 96 · 2021: 101 · 2020: 138 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 23 · 2013: 1
FWCI
78.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Behavioral Addictions (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion)
  • Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) (acceptedVersion)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • European Commission (FP7-PEOPLE-2013-IEF, FP7-PEOPLE-2013, 627999)
  • Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
  • FP7 People: Marie-Curie Actions (FP7-PEOPLE-2013-IEF, FP7-PEOPLE-2013)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
behavioral addiction, activities of daily living, confirmatory research, diagnostic criteria, cognitive processes, research methodology critique
MeSH terms
Humans, Models, Theoretical, Behavior, Addictive, Behavioral Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review