Cited by 243Youth Substance Use and School AttendanceCrime Patterns and InterventionsEducational Outcomes and Influences

Prevalence and correlates of truancy in the US: results from a national sample

Open access
Vaughn, Michael G., Maynard, Brandy R., Salas‐Wright, Christopher P., Perron, Brian E., Abdon, Arnelyn·2013·Journal of Adolescence

Abstract

Truancy has been a persistent problem in the United States for more than 100 years. Although truancy is commonly reported as a risk factor for substance use, delinquency, dropout, and a host of other negative outcomes for youth, there has been surprisingly little empirical investigation into understanding the causes and correlates of truancy using large, nationally representative samples. Using the adolescent sample ( N = 17,482) of the 2009 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), this study presents the prevalence of truancy and examines individual, school engagement, parental, and behavioral correlates of truancy. Overall, 11% of adolescents between the ages of 12–17 reported skipping school in the past 30 days. Results from multinomial logistic regression models indicate skipping school was robustly associated with an increased probability of reporting externalizing behaviors, less parental involvement, and engagement and lower grades in school. Implications for theory, prevention, and policy are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.03.015

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An accumulation of risk/contextual factors appears to exacerbate risk of school attendance problems and thus may be more evident in Tier 3 than Tier 2 cases.

    “An accumulation of risk/contextual factors appears to exacerbate risk of school attendance problems (Catalano et al., 2012; Ingul et al., 2019) and thus may be more evident in Tier 3 than Tier 2 cases (Vaughn et al., 2013).”

    From Reconciling Contemporary Approaches to School Attendance and School Absenteeism: Toward Promotion and Nimble Response, Global Policy Review and Implementation, and Future Adaptability (Part 1) (2019) · cites this paper as Vaughn et al., 2013

    The Results report stronger associations with several risk behaviors among high-level than moderate truants, supporting the suggested difference in risk profiles. But the paper compares frequencies of skipping school, not Tier 3 and Tier 2 cases, and does not establish how those tiers correspond to its groups. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Khatapoush S Hallfors D Active parental consent and sample bias in a school-based AOD survey 2000 Poster presented at the Addictions 2000 Conference September 22–23, 2000 Cape Cod, Mass

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vaughn, M. G., Maynard, B. R., Salas‐Wright, C. P., Perron, B. E., & Abdon, A.
Affiliations
  • Saint Louis University (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of the Philippines Manila (PH)
Corresponding author
Vaughn, Michael G.
Venue
Journal of Adolescence
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-04-23
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
767-776
ISSN
  • 0140-1971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9254
OpenAlex
W2052980134
Cited by
243
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
83.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P50HD052117)
  • Institute of Education Sciences (R324A100022, R324B080008)
  • Meadows Center for Preventing Educational Risk
  • Greater Texas Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Youth Substance Use and School Attendance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
Keywords
truancy, school skipping, externalizing problems, parental involvement, school engagement, academic performance, substance use risk, delinquency, school dropout
MeSH terms
Absenteeism, Adolescent, Age Factors, Alcoholism, Anxiety Disorders, Attitude, Marijuana Abuse, Data Collection, Depressive Disorder, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Social Identification, Social Support, Socioeconomic Factors, Statistics as Topic, Illicit Drugs, Students, United States, Comorbidity, Parenting, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review