Cited by 141Youth Substance Use and School AttendanceCrime Patterns and InterventionsEducational Outcomes and Influences

Who are truant youth? Examining distinctive profiles of truant youth using latent profile analysis

Open access
Maynard, Brandy R., Salas-Wright, Christopher P., Vaughn, Michael G., Peters, Kristen E.·2012·Journal of Youth and Adolescence

Abstract

The present study explored the heterogeneity of truant youth to provide a more nuanced examination of the nature of adolescent truancy and examine distinct profiles of truant youth as they relate to externalizing behaviors. Latent profile analysis was employed to examine the heterogeneity of truant youth by using a nationally representative sample of 1,646 truant adolescents (49.8 % female) from the 2010 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Five key indicator variables were utilized to identify latent classes: school engagement, participation in school-based activities, grades, parental academic involvement, and number of school days skipped. Additionally, multinomial regression was employed to examine the relationship between latent truant youth classes and externalizing behaviors. Four classes of truant youth were identified: achievers (28.55 %), moderate students (24.30 %), academically disengaged (40.89 %), and chronic skippers (6.26 %). Additionally, group membership was found to be associated differentially with marijuana use, fighting, theft and selling drugs. Results from the present study suggest that truant youth are not a homogenous group, but rather present with different risk profiles as they relate to key indicators, demographic characteristics and externalizing behaviors. Implications for practice, policy and future research are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10964-012-9788-1

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dimensional approaches focus on fluid or latent constructs such as attendance profiles, absenteeism severity, risk factors, functions, and interventions arranged along spectra or continua.

    “Such approaches, described in more detail in later sections, focus on fluid or latent constructs such as attendance profiles, absenteeism severity, risk factors, functions, and interventions that can be arranged along various spectra or continua”

    From Reconciling Contemporary Approaches to School Attendance and School Absenteeism: Toward Promotion and Nimble Response, Global Policy Review and Implementation, and Future Adaptability (Part 1) (2019) · cites this paper as Maynard et al., 2012

    The Method (Statistical Analyses and Measures; page unavailable) uses latent profile analysis with continuous indicators, including days skipped, to identify attendance-related profiles. The Introduction discusses truancy risk factors, but the paper does not describe functions or interventions as constructs arranged along spectra or continua. Its profiles are formulated as distinct classes, so it supports only part of the broader description. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • School attendance problems (SAPs) are heterogeneous with respect to etiology and presentation.

    “School attendance problems (SAPs) are heterogeneous with respect to etiology and presentation.”

    From Differentiation between school attendance problems: why and how? (2019) · cites this paper as Maynard et al., 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maynard, B. R., Salas-Wright, C. P., Vaughn, M. G., & Peters, K. E.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Saint Louis University (US)
Corresponding author
Maynard, Brandy R.
Venue
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Published
2012-07-06
Volume
41
Issue
12
Pages
1671-1684
ISSN
  • 0047-2891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6601
OpenAlex
W1967519467
Cited by
141
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
44.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Institute of Education Sciences
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P50HD052117)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Youth Substance Use and School Attendance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
Keywords
externalizing problems, school engagement, school skipping, student disengagement, cannabis use, fighting, theft, drug selling, risk profile
MeSH terms
Absenteeism, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Female, Humans, Life Style, Male, Peer Group, Regression Analysis, Residence Characteristics, Risk Factors, Schools, Socioeconomic Factors, Students, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review