Cited by 906Youth Substance Use and School AttendanceSchool Health and Nursing EducationChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

School absenteeism and school refusal behavior in youth: A contemporary review

Kearney, Christopher A.·2008·Clinical Psychology Review

Abstract

Absenteeism from school is a serious public health issue for mental health professionals, physicians, and educators. The prevalence of unexcused absences from school exceeds that of major childhood behavior disorders and is a key risk factor for violence, injury, substance use, psychiatric disorders, and economic deprivation. This article involves a contemporary research review on absenteeism prevalence, comorbid physical and psychiatric conditions, classification, contextual risk factors, cross-cultural variables, assessment, intervention, and outcome. Contextual risk factors include homelessness and poverty, teenage pregnancy, school violence and victimization, school climate and connectedness, parental involvement, and family variables, among others. A description of intervention includes medical, clinical, and systemic interventions. Medical professionals, community- and school-based mental health professionals, and educators are encouraged to fully understand the parameters of school absenteeism to develop better, consensual policies regarding definition, classification, assessment, and intervention of youths with problematic school absenteeism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2007.07.012

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous reviews of risk factors for school absenteeism and dropout were merely qualitative in nature.

    “However, these reviews were merely qualitative in nature, and until today, the literature on risk factors for school absenteeism and dropout has never been meta-analytically or quantitatively synthesized.”

    From Risk Factors for School Absenteeism and Dropout: A Meta-Analytic Review (2019) · cites this paper as Kearney 2008b

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kearney, C. A.
Affiliations
University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
Corresponding author
Kearney, Christopher A.
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-03
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
451-471
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048999606
Cited by
906
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 88 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 31
FWCI
55.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Youth Substance Use and School Attendance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
school absenteeism, school refusal, youth, unexcused absences, contextual risk factors, homelessness, poverty, adolescent pregnancy, school violence, school climate, parental involvement, family factors, psychiatric comorbidity, substance use, violence, intervention, assessment, cross-cultural factors, school mental health
MeSH terms
Absenteeism, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Mental Disorders, Female, Ill-Housed Persons, Humans, Juvenile Delinquency, Male, Poverty, Pregnancy, Pregnancy in Adolescence, Risk Factors, Students, United States, Prevalence, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review