Cited by 53Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentPoisoning and overdose treatmentsSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Naloxone therapy in opioid overdose patients: Intranasal or intravenous? A randomized clinical trial

Open access
Sabzghabaee, Ali Mohammad, Eizadi-Mood, Nastaran, Yaraghi, Ahmad, Zandifar, Samaneh·2014·Archives of Medical Science

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study was designed to compare the effects of intranasal (IN) and intravenous (IV) administration of naloxone in patients who had overdosed on opioids. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This randomized clinical trial study was conducted in the Department of Poisoning Emergencies at Noor and Ali Asghar (PBUH) University Hospital. One hundred opioid overdose patients were assigned by random allocation software into two study groups (n = 50). Both groups received 0.4 mg naloxone: one group IN and the other IV. Outcomes included change in the level of consciousness (measured using a descriptive scale and the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)), time to response, vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory rate), arterial blood O2 saturation before and after naloxone administration, side-effects (agitation) and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Patients who had been administered IN naloxone demonstrated significantly higher levels of consciousness than those in the IV group using both descriptive and GCS scales (p < 0.001). There was a significant difference in the heart rate between IN and IV groups (p = 0.003). However, blood pressure, respiratory rate and arterial O2 saturation were not significantly different between the two groups after naloxone administration (p = 0.18, p = 0.17, p = 0.32). There was also no significant difference in the length of hospital stay between the two groups (p = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: Intranasal naloxone is as effective as IV naloxone in reversing both respiratory depression and depressive effects on the central nervous system caused by opioid overdose.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5114/aoms.2014.42584

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The same dose of intranasal NAL is as effective as i.v. NAL in reversing effects on the central nervous system caused by opioid overdose in humans.

    “It has been shown that the same dose of intranasal NAL is as effective as i.v. NAL in reversing effects on the central nervous system caused by opioid overdose in humans (59).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]Goodman & Gilman's the pharmacological basis of therapeutics 1996 New York McGraw-Hill, Health Professions Division 549 51

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sabzghabaee, A. M., Eizadi-Mood, N., Yaraghi, A., & Zandifar, S.
Affiliations
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Yaraghi, Ahmad
Venue
Archives of Medical Science
Published
2014
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
309-314
ISSN
1734-1922 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043671257
Cited by
53
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1
FWCI
7.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Archives of Medical Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Poisoning and overdose treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
naloxone, opioid overdose, intranasal administration, intravenous administration, route of administration comparison, respiratory depression, level of consciousness, Glasgow Coma Scale, agitation, length of hospital stay

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review