Cited by 469Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsOcular Diseases and Behçet’s SyndromeRetinal and Macular Surgery

Choroidal neovascularization

Grossniklaus, Hans E., Green, W.Richard·2004·American Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract

Purpose To review clinicopathologic findings of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in a historical framework with emphasis on pathobiology and correlation with treatment.Design Selective literature review combined with authors' experience.Results Choroidal neovascularization represents a stereotypic, nonspecific response to a specific stimulus. Although CNV differs among patients, the general growth patterns are subretinal pigment epithelium (type 1), subretinal (type 2), or combined. Choroidal neovascularization occurs over time in dynamic stages of initiation, active and involutional. Treatments are now being designed based on modern understanding of CNV growth.Conclusions Progress continues to be made concerning understanding the pathobiology and treatment of CNV.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajo.2003.09.042

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In choroidal neovascularization, vessels eventually break through the RPE, resulting in severe clinical phenotypes including neovascular AMD, hemorrhagic AMD, and disciform AMD.

    “These vessels eventually break through the RPE (60), resulting in severe clinical phenotypes including (a) neovascular AMD, where lipid-rich fluid accumulates under the RPE and/or neural retina; (b) hemorrhagic AMD, where blood breaks through the RPE into the subretinal space; and (c) disciform AMD, where fibrous tissue with NV and altered RPE proliferates and replaces neural retina.”
  • Early choroidal neovascularisation occurs under the retinal pigment epithelium, eventually breaking through to develop exudative, haemorrhagic, or disciform age-related macular degeneration.

    “Early choroidal neovascularisation occurs under the retinal pigment epithelium,133,134 eventually breaking through135 to develop exudative, haemorrhagic, or disciform age-related macular degeneration (figure 6).”

    From Age-related macular degeneration (2008) · cites this paper as [135]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grossniklaus, H. E., & Green, W. R.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Grossniklaus, Hans E.
Venue
American Journal of Ophthalmology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-03
Volume
137
Issue
3
Pages
496-503
ISSN
0002-9394 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4233657213
Cited by
469
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 19
FWCI
3.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (U10 13165)
  • National Eye Institute (P-30-EY06360, P30EY006360)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal and Macular Surgery
Keywords
choroidal neovascularization, pathobiology, clinicopathological correlation, subretinal pigment epithelium, subretinal neovascularization, age-related macular degeneration
MeSH terms
Humans, Choroidal Neovascularization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review