Cited by 72Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health InterventionsMental Health Treatment and Access

‘SMS’ for mental health – Feasibility and acceptability of using text messages for mental health promotion among young women from urban low income settings in India

Chandra, Prabha S., Sowmya, H.R., Mehrotra, Seema, Duggal, Mona·2014·Asian Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective The current study assesses the acceptability and feasibility of mobile text messages for promoting positive mental health and as a helpline among young women in urban slums of Bangalore.Methodology Forty girls in the age range of 16-18 years from urban slums received messages every day for a month. They could call or message back or give a 'missed call' to the same number whenever they had emotional problems or felt like talking to a counselor. The received responses in the form of return texts, missed calls and return phone calls were recorded. Feedback about the feasibility and acceptability of the mobile messages was collected after a month.Results 25 out of 40 (62.5%) participants called back, asking for mental health services and to say they felt good about the messages. 23 of 40 (57.5%) messaged back regarding their feelings. 62% reported that they felt supported with the mental health messages. Male family members of nearly half of the participants called back to check the authenticity of the source. Most women did not face any problems because of the messages.Conclusion This pilot qualitative study indicates that mobile text messages are a feasible and culturally acceptable method for mental health promotion and prevention among young women from urban slums in India. Issues such as consent from the woman and family, ensuring confidentiality and providing authentic and reliable support services, need to be taken into account before attempting to scale up such a service, particularly in vulnerable groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajp.2014.06.008

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chandra, P. S., Sowmya, H. R., Mehrotra, S., & Duggal, M.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (IN)
  • Translational Health Science and Technology Institute (IN)
Corresponding author
Chandra, Prabha S.
Venue
Asian Journal of Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
11
Pages
59-64
ISSN
1876-2018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034328890
Cited by
72
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
9.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Asian Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Department of Health Research (DHR) Ministry of Health and Family welfare, Government of India (DHR/Plan scheme/GIA/11/2012/dated 31/3/2012)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
text messaging, mental health promotion, young women, urban slums, low-income settings, feasibility, acceptability, telephone helpline, adolescent mental health, confidentiality, family consent
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Feasibility Studies, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, India, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Pilot Projects, Poverty, Urban Population, Qualitative Research, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review