Cited by 134Urban Transport and AccessibilityUrban Green Space and HealthUrban Design and Spatial Analysis

Neighborhood Design and Walking

Open access
Wells, Nancy M., Yang, Yizhao·2008·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Background Few studies have employed longitudinal data to examine associations between the physical environment and walking.Methods Using cross-sectional (n=70) and longitudinal (n=32) data (collected 2003-2006), associations of neighborhood design and demographics with walking were examined. Participants were low-income, primarily African-American women in the southeastern U.S. Through a natural experiment, some women relocated to neo-traditional communities (experimental group) and others moved to conventional suburban neighborhoods (control group).Results Post-move cross-sectional comparisons indicated that women in neo-traditional neighborhoods did not, on average, walk more than women in suburban neighborhoods. Race and household size were significant predictors of physical activity. Additionally, using longitudinal data, this study controlled for the effects of pre-move walking and demographics. Analyses examined the effects of environmental factors (e.g., density, land-use mix, street-network patterns) on post-move walking. Women who moved to places with fewer culs-de-sac, on average, walked more. Unexpectedly, increases in land-use mix were associated with less walking.Conclusions Results suggest that neo-traditional neighborhood features alone (e.g., sidewalks, front porches, small set-back distances) may not be enough to affect walking; however, changes in street patterns may play a role.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.01.019

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Rodríguez DA, Khattak AJ, Evenson KR. Can new urbanism encourage physical activity? J Am Planning Assoc 2006;72:43-54.
  2. Evans GW, Lepore SJ, Schroeder A. The role of architecture in human responses to crowding. J Pers Soc Psychol 1996;70:41-6.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wells, N. M., & Yang, Y.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • University of Oregon (US)
Corresponding author
Wells, Nancy M.
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-04
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
313-319
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2110185743
Cited by
134
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
20.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Urban Green Space and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
Keywords
neighbourhood design, walking, physical activity, suburbs, mixed land use, density, African American women, low-income women, relocation, sidewalks, front porches, household size, race
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Environment Design, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged, Population Dynamics, Residence Characteristics, Southeastern United States, Body Mass Index, Walking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review