Cited by 82Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health Interventions

Designing and undertaking a health economics study of digital health interventions

Open access
McNamee, Paul, Murray, Elizabeth, Kelly, Michael P., Bojke, Laura, Chilcott, Jim, Fischer, Alastair, West, Robert, Yardley, Lucy·2016·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

This paper introduces and discusses key issues in the economic evaluation of digital health interventions. The purpose is to stimulate debate so that existing economic techniques may be refined or new methods developed. The paper does not seek to provide definitive guidance on appropriate methods of economic analysis for digital health interventions. This paper describes existing guides and analytic frameworks that have been suggested for the economic evaluation of healthcare interventions. Using selected examples of digital health interventions, it assesses how well existing guides and frameworks align to digital health interventions. It shows that digital health interventions may be best characterized as complex interventions in complex systems. Key features of complexity relate to intervention complexity, outcome complexity, and causal pathway complexity, with much of this driven by iterative intervention development over time and uncertainty regarding likely reach of the interventions among the relevant population. These characteristics imply that more-complex methods of economic evaluation are likely to be better able to capture fully the impact of the intervention on costs and benefits over the appropriate time horizon. This complexity includes wider measurement of costs and benefits, and a modeling framework that is able to capture dynamic interactions among the intervention, the population of interest, and the environment. The authors recommend that future research should develop and apply more-flexible modeling techniques to allow better prediction of the interdependency between interventions and important environmental influences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.05.007

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reach, uptake and context are particularly salient for digital health interventions because impact and cost-effectiveness depend on the total number of users, and effectiveness may depend on context.

    “The concepts of reach, uptake and context are particularly salient for DHI, as impact and cost-effectiveness are highly dependent on the total number of users (McNamee 2016), and effectiveness may be highly dependent on context.”

    From Evaluating Digital Health Interventions (2016) · cites this paper as McNamee 2016

  • Establishing and optimising reach and uptake requires human-centred design methods from engineering and computer science.

    “Establishing and optimising potential reach and uptake requires methods used in engineering and computer science, collectively referred to as human-centred design 25–27.”

    From Evaluating Digital Health Interventions (2016) · cites this paper as [25]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [44]44. Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow . First ed. London: Penguin; 2012.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McNamee, P., Murray, E., Kelly, M. P., Bojke, L., Chilcott, J., Fischer, A., West, R., & Yardley, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of York (GB)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (GB)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
Corresponding author
McNamee, Paul
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
51
Issue
5
Pages
852-860
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2344797598
Cited by
82
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
13.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1539846)
  • Scottish Government
  • Cancer Research UK (14135)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (RP-PG-0609-10135)
  • Chief Scientist Office, Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorate
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K023195/1)
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/G007489/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
digital health interventions, economic evaluation, complex interventions, complex systems, intervention complexity, dynamic modeling, cost-benefit analysis
MeSH terms
Cost-Benefit Analysis, Health Promotion, Humans, Research Design, Telecommunications, Program Evaluation, Health Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review