Cited by 17Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsObesity and Health Practices

Trends in Lifestyle Counseling for Adults With and Without Diabetes in the U.S., 2005–2015

Open access
Shah, Megha K., Moore, Miranda A., Narayan, K.M. Venkat, Ali, Mohammed K.·2019·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Introduction Strong evidence shows that lifestyle change and weight loss stimulated by counseling improve glycemic control and lower comorbidities for patients with diabetes, but it is unclear whether diet or physical activity counseling for patients with diabetes in ambulatory settings has actually been responsive to this evidence. Methods Data from the 2005-2015 National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys were used to assess trends in provider-reported diet or exercise counseling during ambulatory care visits. The data were pooled and multivariate logistic regression models were built, adjusting for patient-, provider-, and practice-level characteristics to examine whether the provision of counseling varied by these characteristics. Data were analyzed from September 2018 to December 2018. Results There were 42,234 adults with diabetes and 272,094 adults without diabetes. The proportions of patients with provider-reported Type 2 diabetes who received any diet or exercise counseling were no different over time, 30% in 2005 (95% CI=25%, 35%) and 25% in 2015 (95% CI=18%, 31%). Lower proportions of those without diabetes received any counseling, 17% in 2005 (95% CI=14%, 19%) and 15% in 2015 (95% CI=11%, 18%). Adjusted models showed that Hispanic patients had a higher likelihood of receiving diet or exercise counseling, compared with whites (OR=1.38, 95% CI=1.09, 1.75). Those aged 30-49 years were more likely to receive diet or exercise counseling than those aged >75 years (OR=1.51, 95% CI=1.27, 1.80). Compared with rural areas and other providers, visits in a metropolitan area (OR=1.27, 95% CI=1.09, 1.47) or with an advanced practice provider (OR=1.66, 95% CI=1.00, 2.75) had a higher likelihood of any diet or exercise counseling delivery. Conclusions Less than 30% of Americans with diabetes receive diet or exercise counseling in ambulatory visits, and this proportion has not changed significantly in a decade. Future interventions should focus on addressing this gap in counseling.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.07.005

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Less than 30% of diabetic ambulatory visits with healthcare providers include diet or exercise counseling.

    “Less than 30% of diabetic ambulatory visits with healthcare providers include diet or exercise counseling.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shah, M. K., Moore, M. A., Narayan, K. M. V., & Ali, M. K.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Shah, Megha K.
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
57
Issue
5
Pages
e153-e161
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2980775368
Cited by
17
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • Chicago Center for Diabetes Translation Research
  • National Institutes of Health (KL2TR002381, UL1TR002378)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK111024)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, lifestyle counseling, nutrition counseling, physical activity counseling, outpatient care, health care utilization trends, Hispanic patients, advanced practice providers, urban-rural differences, glycemic control, National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, quality of care gaps, physical activity promotion, obesity treatment, health disparities, health care access
MeSH terms
Healthy Lifestyle, Professional Practice Gaps, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Ambulatory Care, Counseling, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Practice Patterns, Physicians', United States, Weight Loss, Exercise, Comorbidity, Health Care Surveys, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review