Cited by 236Cardiac Health and Mental HealthHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

Usefulness of Type D Personality in Predicting Five-Year Cardiac Events Above and Beyond Concurrent Symptoms of Stress in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease

Open access
Denollet, Johan, Pedersen, Susanne S., Vrints, Christiaan J., Conraads, Viviane M.·2006·The American Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Psychological stress and type D personality have been associated with adverse cardiac prognosis, but little is known about their relative effect on the pathogenesis of coronary heart disease (CHD). "Type D" refers to the tendency to experience negative emotions and to inhibit the expression of these emotions in social interactions. We investigated the relative effect of stress and type D personality on prognosis at 5-year follow-up. At baseline, 337 patients with CHD who participated in cardiac rehabilitation filled in the General Health Questionnaire (psychological stress) and the Type D personality scale. Patients were followed for 5 years. The end point was major adverse cardiac events, which were defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and cardiac revascularization (coronary artery bypass grafting/percutaneous coronary intervention). There were 46 major adverse cardiac events at follow-up, including 4 deaths and 8 myocardial infarctions. Type D patients had an increased risk of death/infarction (odds ratio 4.84, 95% confidence interval 1.42 to 16.52, p = 0.01) compared with non-type D patients, independent of disease severity. Stress (p = 0.011) and type D (p = 0.001) were related to an increased risk of developing a major adverse cardiac event after adjusting for gender, age, and biomedical risk factors. Multivariate analysis yielded left ventricular ejection fraction < or =40%, no treatment with coronary artery bypass grafting, and type D personality (odds ratio 2.90, 95% confidence interval 1.42 to 5.92, p = 0.003) as independent predictors of major adverse cardiac events, whereas psychological stress was marginally significant (odds ratio 2.01, 95% confidence interval 0.99 to 4.11, p = 0.054). In conclusion, type D personality is a psychological factor that may optimize risk stratification in patients with CHD. Type D reflects more than temporary changes in general stress level because it predicted cardiac events after controlling for concurrent symptoms of stress.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.10.035

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Specific emotional experiences have distinct neurobiological and behavioral features and uniquely contribute to CVD risk.

    “However, specific emotional experiences have distinct neurobiological and behavioral features, and they uniquely contribute to CVD risk. 10-13”

    From Psychological Health, Well-Being, and the Mind-Heart-Body Connection: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2021) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Results (p. 4) show that type D personality predicted five-year cardiac events in patients with coronary heart disease independently of concurrent stress symptoms. The discussion (p. 5) says its biological and behavioral characteristics that might promote disease progression still need to be determined. The paper therefore does not establish that specific emotional experiences have distinct neurobiological and behavioral features or that each uniquely contributes to CVD risk. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. [2]Frasure-Smith N. In-hospital symptoms of psychological stress as predictors of long-term outcome after acute myocardial infarction in men. Am J Cardiol 1991;67:121-127.
  2. [3]Robinson KL, McBeth J, Macfarlane GJ. Psychological distress and premature mortality in the general population: a prospective study. Ann Epidemiol 2004;14:467-472.
  3. [4]Nicholson A, Fuhrer R, Marmot M. Psychological distress as a predictor of CHD events in men: the effect of persistence and components of risk. Psychosom Med 2005;67:522-530.
  4. [5]Denollet J, Sys SU, Stroobant N, Rombouts H, Gillebert TC, Brutsaert DL. Personality as independent predictor of long-term mortality in patients with coronary heart disease. Lancet 1996;347:417-421.
  5. [6]Denollet J, Vaes J, Brutsaert DL. Inadequate response to treatment in coronary heart disease: adverse effects of type-D personality and younger age on 5-year prognosis and quality of life. Circulation 2000;102:630-635.
  6. [7]Pedersen SS, Lemos PA, van Vooren PR, Liu TK, Daemen J, Erdman RAM, Smits PC, Serruys PW, van Domburg RT. Type-D personality predicts death or myocardial infarction after bare metal stent or sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: a Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) registry sub-study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:997-1001.
  7. [8]Kop WJ. Chronic and acute psychological risk factors for clinical manifestations of coronary artery disease. Psychosom Med 1999;61: 476-487.
  8. [9]Sher L. Type-D personality: the heart, stress, and cortisol. QJM 2005; 98:323-329.
  9. [11]Denollet J. Personality and coronary heart disease: the Type-D Scale-16 (DS16). Ann Behav Med 1998;20:209-215.
  10. [12]Denollet J, Brutsaert DL. Personality, disease severity, and the risk of long-term cardiac events in patients with decreased ejection fraction after myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998;97:167-173.
  11. [14]Blumenthal JA, Sherwood A, Babyak MA, Watkins LL, Waugh R, Georgiades A, Bacon SL, Hayano J, Coleman RE, Hinderliter A. Effects of exercise and stress management training on markers of cardiovascular risk in patients with ischemic heart disease: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005;293:1626-1634.
  12. [15]Taylor CB, Youngblood ME, Catellier D, Veith RC, Carney RM, Burg MM, Kaufmann PG, Shuster J, Mellman T, Blumenthal JA, et al, for the ENRICHD Investigators. Effects of antidepressant medication on morbidity and mortality in depressed patients after myocardial infarction. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005;62:792-798.
  13. [16]Habra ME, Linden W, Anderson JC, Weinberg J. Type-D personality is related to cardio-vascular and neuroendocrine reactivity to acute stress. J Psychosom Res 2003;55:235-245.
  14. [18]Denollet J, Pedersen SS, Ong ATL, Erdman RAM, Serruys PW, van Domburg RT. Social inhibition modulates the effect of negative emotions on cardiac prognosis following percutaneous coronary intervention in the drug-eluting stent era. Eur Heart J 2006;27:171-177.
  15. [19]Denollet J. DS14: standard assessment of negative affectivity, social inhibition and type-D personality. Psychosom Med 2005;67:89-97.
  16. [20]Albus C, Jordan J, Herrmann-Lingen C. Screening for psychosocial risk factors in patients with coronary heart disease-recommendations for clinical practice. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2004;11:75-79.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Denollet, J., Pedersen, S. S., Vrints, C. J., & Conraads, V. M.
Affiliations
  • Tilburg University (NL)
  • Antwerp University Hospital (BE)
Corresponding author
Denollet, Johan
Venue
The American Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-04
Volume
97
Issue
7
Pages
970-973
ISSN
0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094103850
Cited by
236
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 26
FWCI
12.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Keywords
Type D personality, psychological stress, coronary artery disease, major adverse cardiac events, cardiac prognosis, risk stratification, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular mortality, left ventricular ejection fraction, coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous coronary intervention, cardiac rehabilitation, negative affectivity
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Coronary Disease, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Myocardial Revascularization, Personality, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Stress, Psychological, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review