Cited by 1,377Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsMedicine, History, and PhilosophyProblem Solving Skills Development

Medical Problem Solving: An Analysis of Clinical Reasoning

Elstein, Arthur S., Shulman, Lee S., Sprafka, Sarah A.·1978·Harvard University Press eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4159/harvard.9780674189089

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ability to solve problems is highly dependent on the knowledge on which the case is based, also known as case specificity.

    “With further study, it became clear that the ability to solve problems was highly dependent on the knowledge on which the case was based ) also known as case specificity.32,37”

    From Test-enhanced learning in medical education (2008) · cites this paper as [37]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elstein, A. S., Shulman, L. S., & Sprafka, S. A.
Venue
Harvard University Press eBooks
Published
1978-12-31
OpenAlex
W4298037799
Cited by
1,377
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 26
FWCI
5.65
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Harvard University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Problem Solving Skills Development
Keywords
clinical problem solving, clinical reasoning, diagnosis, clinical decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review