Cited by 52Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchBacterial biofilms and quorum sensingMicrobial infections and disease research

Co-adhesion and biofilm formation by Fusobacterium nucleatum in response to growth pH

Zilm, Peter S., Rogers, Anthony H.·2007·Anaerobe

Abstract

Fusobacterium nucleatum is a Gram-negative anaerobic organism considered to play an important role in the progression of periodontal disease and is commonly found in clinical infections of other body sites. Apart from its metabolic versatility, its cell-surface properties enable it to attach to epithelial cells, collagen, gingival epithelial cells and other bacterial genera, but not with other Fusobacteria. The development of periodontitis is associated with a rise in pH in the gingival sulcus to around 8.5, and this is thought to occur by the catabolism of proteins supplied by gingival crevicular fluid. F. nucleatum is commonly isolated from diseased sites and has also been shown to survive in root canal systems at pH 9.0 after Ca(OH)(2) treatment. In order to survive hostile environmental conditions, such as nutrient deprivation and fluctuating temperature and pH, bacteria form biofilms, which are usually made up of multi-species co-aggregates. We have grown F. nucleatum in a chemostat at a growth rate consistent with that of oral bacteria in vivo and report that, at a growth pH of 8.2, F. nucleatum co-adheres and forms a homogeneous biofilm. Cell-surface hydrophobicity was determined in planktonic and co-adhering cells to characterise the interfacial interactions associated with the response to pH. Cell-surface hydrophobicity was found to increase at pH 8.2 and this was also associated with a decrease in the levels of intracellular polyglucose (IP) and an observed change in the bacterial cell morphology. To our knowledge, these results represent the first study in which F. nucleatum has been shown to co-adhere and form a biofilm, which may be important in the organism's persistence during the transition from health to disease in vivo.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2007.04.005

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zilm, P. S., & Rogers, A. H.
Affiliations
The University of Adelaide (AU)
Corresponding author
Zilm, Peter S.
Venue
Anaerobe
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-06
Volume
13
Issue
3-4
Pages
146-152
ISSN
1075-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034794071
Cited by
52
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Anaerobe (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Dental Research Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
Keywords
Fusobacterium nucleatum, biofilm formation, cell surface hydrophobicity, cell morphology, periodontitis, gingival crevicular fluid, anaerobic bacteria, bacterial persistence, oral microbiota
MeSH terms
Bacterial Adhesion, Dental Enamel, Gingiva, Humans, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Surface Properties, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Biofilms, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review