Cited by 332Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesTrauma and Emergency Care Studies

Elevated levels of serum glial fibrillary acidic protein breakdown products in mild and moderate traumatic brain injury are associated with intracranial lesions and neurosurgical intervention

Open access
Papa, Linda, Lewis, Lawrence M., Falk, Jay L., Zhang, Zhiqun, Silvestri, Salvatore, Giordano, Philip, Brophy, Gretchen M., Demery, Jason A. +11 more·2012·Annals of Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Objective This study examined whether serum levels of GFAP breakdown products (GFAP-BDP) were elevated in mild and moderate TBI compared to controls and if they were associated with traumatic intracranial lesions on CT scan (+CT) and having a neurosurgical intervention (NSI). Methods This prospective cohort study enrolled adult patients presenting to three Level 1 Trauma Centers following blunt head trauma with loss of consciousness, amnesia, or disorientation and a GCS 9–15. Control groups included normal uninjured controls and trauma controls presenting to the ED with orthopedic injuries or an MVC without TBI. Blood samples were obtained in all patients within 4 hours of injury and measured by ELISA for GFAP-BDP (ng/ml). Results Of the 307 patients enrolled, 108 were TBI patients (97 with GCS 13–15, and 11 with GCS 9–12) and 199 were controls (176 normal controls and 16 MVC controls and 7 orthopedic controls). ROC curves demonstrated that early GFAP-BDP levels were able to distinguish TBI from uninjured controls with an AUC of 0.90 (95%CI 0.86–0.94) and differentiated TBI with a GCS 15 with an AUC 0.88 (95%CI 0.82–0.93). Thirty two TBI patients (30%) had lesions on CT. The AUC for discriminating those patients with CT lesions versus those without CT lesions was 0.79 (95%CI 0.69–0.89). Moreover, the ROC curve for distinguishing NSI from no NSI yielded an AUC of 0.87 (95%CI 0.77–0.96). Conclusions GFAP-BDP is detectable in serum within an hour of injury and is associated with measures of injury severity including the GCS score, CT lesions and neurosurgical intervention. Further study is required to validate these findings before clinical application.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.08.021

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Antibodies may form after TBI due to disruption of the blood-brain barrier, allowing brain proteins to leak into the circulation and evoke an immune response.

    “Antibodies may form after TBI due to the disruption of the blood-brain barrier, which allows brain proteins (especially the release of sequestered pituitary and hypothalamic antigens from injured/ necrotic tissue) to leak into the circulation, evoking an immune response (164, 165).”

    From Pituitary Dysfunction After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Clinical and Pathophysiological Approach (2015) · cites this paper as [165]

    The Results report that GFAP breakdown products appeared rapidly in serum after TBI, and the Discussion describes their release from injured glial cells. The paper does not attribute that appearance to blood–brain barrier disruption or discuss antibody formation, an immune response, or pituitary and hypothalamic antigens. No page numbers were provided for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [59]Zhang Z Yang B Glushakova O Alterations in the expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein and fragmentation in the subacute phase of brain injury [Abstract] The 28th National Neurotrauma Society Symposium Vol suppl Las Vegas, Nevada J Neurotrauma 2010

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Papa, L., Lewis, L. M., Falk, J. L., Zhang, Z., Silvestri, S., Giordano, P., Brophy, G. M., Demery, J. A., Dixit, N. K., Ferguson, I., Liu, M. C., Mo, J., Akinyi, L., Schmid, K., Mondello, S., Robertson, C. S., Tortella, F. C., Hayes, R. L., & Wang, K. K. W.
Affiliations
  • Orlando Regional Medical Center (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Orlando Health (US)
  • Banyan Biomarkers (United States) (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • University of Florida Health (US)
  • North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System (US)
  • Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Venue
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-06
Volume
59
Issue
6
Pages
471-483
ISSN
0196-0644 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2033297074
Cited by
332
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 13
FWCI
16.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS057676)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Keywords
traumatic brain injury, serum biomarkers, mild traumatic brain injury, moderate traumatic brain injury, intracranial lesions, neurosurgical treatment, Glasgow Coma Scale, blunt head trauma, injury severity, diagnostic biomarkers, motor vehicle crash injuries, orthopedic trauma, neuroinflammation, neurodegeneration
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Brain, Brain Injuries, Female, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, ROC Curve, Trauma Centers, Glasgow Coma Scale, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review