Cited by 18Spinal Cord Injury ResearchPain Management and TreatmentVirtual Reality Applications and Impacts

Cortical Activation During Visual Illusory Walking in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Study

Open access
Eick, John, Richardson, Elizabeth J.·2015·Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Abstract

Objective To determine the location of cortical activation during a visual illusion walking paradigm, a recently proposed treatment for spinal cord injury (SCI)-related neuropathic pain, in persons with SCI compared with able-bodied controls.Design Pilot experimental functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) trial.Setting Outpatient rehabilitation clinic.Participants Persons with paraplegia (n=3) and able-bodied participants (n=5) were included in this study.Interventions Not applicable.Main outcome measure Cortical activation as measured by the blood oxygenation level-dependent method of fMRI.Results During visually illusory walking there was significant activation in the somatosensory cortex among those with SCI. In contrast, able-bodied participants showed little to no significant activation in this area, but they showed activation in the frontal and premotor areas.Conclusions Treatment modalities for SCI-related neuropathic pain that are based on sensory input paradigms (eg, virtual walking, visual illusory walking) may work by targeting the somatosensory cortex, an area that has been previously found to functionally reorganize after SCI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.10.020

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In some studies, a mirror was used with a video projection of walking legs; in others, walking stimuli consisted of a video of an actor in first-person view walking along a path; and in another, participants viewed their virtual arms and legs in first person view in a virtual world through a head-mounted display.

    “In some studies, a mirror was used with a video projection of walking legs [7, 15–17], in others the walking stimuli consisted of a video of an actor, in first-person view, walking along a path [18, 19] and in the last one participants viewed their virtual arms and legs in first person view in a virtual world through a head-mounted display [20].”
  • Third-person perspective has already been described, while first-person perspective was also applied.

    “Third-person perspective has already been described [7], [15–17], while first-person perspective was also applied [18–20].”
  • The different studies regarding VW did not discuss therapy adherence.

    “The different studies regarding VW did not discuss therapy adherence [7, 15–20].”

    From Virtual walking therapy in neuropathic spinal cord injury pain: a feasibility study (2024) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Methods (Visual illusory walking) describe the study’s simulated-walking procedure, and the Discussion (Limitations) says its aim was to examine cortical activation. Neither passage addresses therapy adherence or states whether other visual-walking studies discussed it; a search for adherence, compliance, attendance, and treatment sessions found no relevant passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eick, J., & Richardson, E. J.
Affiliations
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Corresponding author
Richardson, Elizabeth J.
Venue
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-04
Volume
96
Issue
4
Pages
750-753
ISSN
0003-9993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024672511
Cited by
18
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (H133N110008)
  • National Institutes of Health (1 K23 HD073680-01A1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Keywords
spinal cord injury, neuropathic pain, somatosensory cortex, cortical activation, paraplegia, sensory reorganization, virtual walking, pain management
MeSH terms
Adult, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuralgia, Pain Measurement, Paraplegia, Pilot Projects, Somatosensory Cortex, Spinal Cord Injuries, Walking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review