Cited by 33Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Effect of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at the Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex on the Cognitive Function in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial

Stonsaovapak, Chernkhuan, Hemrungroj, Solaphat, Terachinda, Pim, Piravej, Krisna·2020·Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Abstract

OBJECTIVES Study the effect of anodal transcranial direct stimulation (atDCS) of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on cognitive function and side effects in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). STUDY DESIGN Experimental double-blind randomized, sham-controlled trial SETTING: Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tertiary Hospital SUBJECTS: Volunteers with MCI METHODS: Participants (45) who met the inclusion criteria were randomly allocated by block randomization into two groups. The atDCS group (23 participants) were stimulated at 2 mA for 20 min with the anode on the right DLPFC and cathode on the left supraorbital area. The control group (22 participants) received placebo stimulation. Baseline cognitive function was assessed by the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) test. Participants were treated three times per week for four weeks (12 sessions). Cognitive function and side effects were assessed immediately after the first stimulation, the last session and 4 weeks post-treatment. RESULTS CANTAB results revealed a significant improvement in the accuracy of the visual sustained attention (VSA) in the atDCS group at all three time points, the spatial working memory (SWM) and visual memory (VM) immediately after the first stimulation and a decreased VM reaction time after 12 sessions. Long lasting effect on VSA and VM were found 4 weeks post-treatment. CONCLUSION Anodal tDCS over the right DLPFC enhanced the VSA, SWM and VM a…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.03.023

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 1993, Thai Mental State Examination (TMSE), Siriraj Hosp Gaz, 45, 661
  2. Tangwongchai, 2009, The validity of Thai version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-T), Dement Neuropsychol, 3, 172

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Stonsaovapak, C., Hemrungroj, S., Terachinda, P., & Piravej, K.
Affiliations
  • King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital (TH)
  • Chulalongkorn University (TH)
Corresponding author
Piravej, Krisna
Venue
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
101
Issue
8
Pages
1279-1287
ISSN
0003-9993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3023396093
Cited by
33
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Chulalongkorn University (RA 58/095)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
anodal tDCS, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, mild cognitive impairment, cognitive function, spatial working memory, visual memory, reaction time, non-invasive brain stimulation
MeSH terms
Aged, Cognition, Double-Blind Method, Electrodes, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Reaction Time, Prefrontal Cortex, Cognitive Dysfunction, Spatial Memory, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review