Cited by 218Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesCognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive Functions and Memory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Can transcranial direct current stimulation enhance outcomes from cognitive training? A randomized controlled trial in healthy participants

Open access

Abstract

Computer-administered cognitive training (CT) tasks are a common component of cognitive remediation treatments. There is growing evidence that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), when given during cognitive tasks, improves performance. This randomized, controlled trial explored the potential synergistic effects of CT combined with tDCS in healthy participants. Altogether, 60 healthy participants were randomized to receive either active or sham tDCS administered during training on an adaptive CT task (dual n-back task), or tDCS alone, over 10 daily sessions. Cognitive testing (working memory, processing speed, executive function, reaction time) was conducted at baseline, end of the 10 sessions, and at 4-wk follow-up to examine potential transfer effects to non-trained tasks. Altogether, 54 participants completed the study. Over the 10 ‘online’ sessions, participants in the active tDCS+CT condition performed more accurately on the CT task than participants who received sham tDCS+CT. The performance enhancing effect, however, was present only during tDCS and did not result in greater learning (i.e. improvement over sessions) on the CT task. These results confirm prior reports of enhancement of cognitive function during tDCS stimulation. At follow-up, the active tDCS+CT group, but not the sham tDCS+CT group, showed greater gains on a non-trained test of attention and working memory than the tDCS-only group (p < 0.01). Although this gain can mainly be attributable to training, this result suggests that active tDCS may have a role in further enhancing outcomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1461145713000539

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Combining tDCS with cognitive training has demonstrated additive effects on cognitive and functional abilities in younger and older adults.

    “Combining tDCS with cognitive training has demonstrated additive effects on cognitive and functional abilities in younger [30–32] and older adults [33–36].”

    From Primary outcome from the augmenting cognitive training in older adults study (ACT): A tDCS and cognitive training randomized clinical trial (2023) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Discussion reports better accuracy during training with active tDCS than with sham tDCS, but says this effect did not produce greater learning or persist after stimulation. It also says the study could not demonstrate that active tDCS enhanced transfer effects from cognitive training. The Participants and Assessment of transfer effects sections describe healthy university students and cognitive tests, not outcomes for older adults or functional abilities. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Arul-Anandam, 2009, Transcranial direct current stimulation: a new tool for the treatment of depression?, J Affect Disord, 117, 137, 10.1016/j.jad.2009.01.016 · DOI
  2. Benton, 1989, Multilingual aphasia examination
  3. Bikson, 2008, Transcranial direct current stimulation for major depression: a general system for quantifying transcranial electrotherapy dosage, Curr Treat Options Neurol, 10, 377, 10.1007/s11940-008-0040-y · DOI
  4. Ditye, 2012, Modulating behavioural inhibition by tDCS combined with cognitive training, Exp Brain Res, 219, 363, 10.1007/s00221-012-3098-4 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Dockery, 2011, Cumulative benefits of frontal transcranial direct current stimulation on visuo-spatial working memory in rats, Neurobiol Learn Mem, 96, 452, 10.1016/j.nlm.2011.06.018 · DOI
  6. Flöel, 2012, Non-invasive brain stimulation improves object-location learning in the elderly, Neurobiol Aging, 33, 1682, 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.05.007 · DOI
  7. Fox, 2011, Brain buzz, Nature, 472, 156, 10.1038/472156a · DOI
  8. Fridriksson, 2011, Transcranial direct current stimulation improves naming reaction time in fluent aphasia: a doubleblind, sham controlled study, Stroke, 42, 819, 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.600288 · DOI
  9. Iyer, 2005, Safety and cognitive effect of frontal DC brain polarization in healthy individuals, Neurology, 64, 872, 10.1212/01.WNL.0000152986.07469.E9 · DOI
  10. Jaeggi, 2008, Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 105, 6829, 10.1073/pnas.0801268105 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Jaeggi, 2010, The relationship between n-back performance and matrix reasoning – implications for training and transfer, Intelligence, 38, 625, 10.1016/j.intell.2010.09.001 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Javadi, 2012, Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex modulates declarative memory, Brain Stimul, 5, 231, 10.1016/j.brs.2011.06.007 · DOI
  13. Lindenberg, 2010, Bihemispheric brain stimulation facilitates motor recovery in chronic stroke patients, Neurology, 75, 2176, 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318202013a · DOI
  14. Loo, 2010, A double-blind, sham controlled trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of depression, Int J Neuropsychopharmacol, 13, 61, 10.1017/S1461145709990411 · DOI
  15. Martin, 2011, Fronto-extracephalic transcranial direct current stimulation as a treatment for major depression: an open-label pilot study, J Affect Disord, 134, 459, 10.1016/j.jad.2011.05.018 · DOI
  16. Martin, 2013, Continuation transcranial direct current stimulation for the prevention of relapse in major depression, J Affect Disord, 144, 274, 10.1016/j.jad.2012.10.012 · DOI
  17. Moliadze, 2010, Electrode-distance dependent after-effects of transcranial direct and random noise stimulation with extracephalic reference electrodes, Clin Neurophysiol, 121, 2165, 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.04.033 · DOI
  18. Nitsche, 2001, Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans, Neurology, 57, 1899, 10.1212/WNL.57.10.1899 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Ohn, 2008, Time-dependent effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on the enhancement of working memory, Neuroreport, 19, 43, 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f2adfd · DOI
  20. Oldfield, 1971, The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory, Neuropsychologia, 9, 97, 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Reis, 2009, Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 106, 1590, 10.1073/pnas.0805413106 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Reitan, 1985, The Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery
  23. Schambra, 2011, Probing for hemispheric specialisation for motor skill learning: a transcranial direct current stimulation study, J Neurophysiol, 106, 652, 10.1152/jn.00210.2011 · DOI
  24. Spreen, 1998, A compendium of neuropsychological tests: administration, norms, and commentary
  25. Wechsler, 1981, WAIS-R manual
  26. Wechsler, 1997, WAIS-III administration and scoring manual
  27. Zaehle, 2011, Transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex modulates working memory performance: combined behavioural and electrophysiological evidence, BMC Neuro, 12, 2, 10.1186/1471-2202-12-2 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Martin, D. M., Liu, R., Alonzo, A., Green, M., Player, M. J., Sachdev, P., & Loo, C. K.
Affiliations
  • Black Dog Institute (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Loo, Colleen K.
Venue
International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2013-10-01
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
1927-1936
ISSN
  • 1461-1457 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5111
OpenAlex
W2133502370
Cited by
218
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4
FWCI
10.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UNSWorks (UNSW Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Pfizer
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
transcranial direct current stimulation, cognitive training, cognitive remediation, dual n-back task, working memory, transfer effects, attention, processing speed, executive function, reaction time, healthy volunteers, sham stimulation
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Brain, Cognition, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, New South Wales, Reaction Time, Time Factors, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Chi-Square Distribution, Young Adult, Executive Function, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review