Cited by 160Homelessness and Social IssuesEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Effortful control and adaptive functioning of homeless children: Variable-focused and person-focused analyses

Open access
Obradović, Jelena·2010·Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology

Abstract

Homeless children show significant developmental delays across major domains of adaptation, yet research on protective processes that may contribute to resilient adaptation in this highly disadvantaged group of children is extremely rare. This study examined the role of effortful control for adaption in 58 homeless children, ages 5-6, during their transition to school. Effortful control skills were assessed using children's performance on four standard executive functioning tasks. Adaptive functioning was assessed by teacher report of academic competence, peer competence, and internalizing and externalizing symptoms. Variable-focused and person-focused results indicate that effortful control may be an important marker of school readiness and resilience. Controlling for child IQ, parenting quality, and socio-demographic risks, effortful control emerged as the most significant predictor of all four salient developmental domains of adaptation as well as of resilient status of homeless children. Implications of these findings are discussed for future research and design of interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appdev.2009.09.004

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For HHM students, protective factors such as effective parenting, cognitive skills, and good self-regulation operate to protect achievement.

    “For HHM students, evidence suggests that protective factors, such as effective parenting, cognitive skills, and good self-regulation, operate to protect achievement (Herbers, et al., 2011; Miliotis, et al., 1999; Obradović, 2010).”

    From Academic Achievement Trajectories of Homeless and Highly Mobile Students: Resilience in the Context of Chronic and Acute Risk (2013) · cites this paper as Obradović, 2010

    The Results (Variable-Focused Analyses; page not provided) report that effortful control and IQ predicted academic competence in homeless children. The Discussion (page not provided) says parenting quality was related to academic competence, but was not a significant predictor after effortful control was accounted for. The study concerns homeless children transitioning to school, so it does not establish that all three factors independently protect achievement across the broader HHM student population. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Among homeless children, factors related to resilience include self-regulation, parenting quality, health, and complex interplay among factors.

    “Specifically among homeless children, these factors include self-regulation (Buckner, Mezzacappa, & Beardslee, 2003; Obradović, 2010), parenting quality (Miliotis, Sesma, & Masten, 1999), health (Cutuli, Herbers, Rinaldi, Masten, & Oberg, 2010), and complex interplay among factors (Herbers et al., 2011).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 74 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Rothbart MK Bates JE Damon W Eisenberg N Temperament Handbook of childhood psychology: Social, emotional, personality development 1998 3 105 176 Wiley New York

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Obradović, J.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Obradović, Jelena
Venue
Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-03
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
109-117
ISSN
0193-3973 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076514284
Cited by
160
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
FWCI
12.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • McKnight Foundation
  • University of Minnesota
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH015755)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
homeless children, effortful control, executive function, resilience, adaptive behavior, school readiness, transition to school, academic competence, peer competence, internalizing problems, externalizing problems, child development, protective factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review