Cited by 339Eating Disorders and BehaviorsBehavioral Health and InterventionsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Training inhibitory control. A recipe for resisting sweet temptations

Open access
Houben, Katrijn, Jansen, Anita·2011·Appetite

Abstract

When inhibitory control is lacking, people are more prone to indulge in high calorie food. This research examined whether training to inhibit food-related responses renders one less susceptible to temptations of high calorie food. Trait chocolate lovers were divided into three conditions: participants either consistently inhibited responding to chocolate stimuli (chocolate/no-go condition), consistently responded to chocolate stimuli (chocolate/go condition), or responded to chocolate stimuli only during half the trials (control condition). Chocolate consumption was measured following the manipulation with a taste test. Chocolate consumption did not differ between the control condition and the chocolate/go condition, and increased as a function of dietary restraint in both conditions. In the chocolate/no-go condition, however, chocolate consumption was significantly reduced, and higher levels of dietary restraint were associated with decreased chocolate intake. These findings demonstrate that repeatedly practicing inhibitory control over food-related responses can help people regain control over the consumption of high calorie food.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appet.2010.12.017

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Houben, K., & Jansen, A.
Affiliations
Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Houben, Katrijn
Venue
Appetite
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
56
Issue
2
Pages
345-349
ISSN
0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2149497628
Cited by
339
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 17
FWCI
16.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Appetite (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Stichting voor de Technische Wetenschappen
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
inhibitory control, food temptation, high-calorie foods, chocolate consumption, dietary restraint, dietary habits
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Cacao, Feeding Behavior, Female, Food Preferences, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Motivation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Taste Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review