Cited by 60Regulation of Appetite and ObesityMemory and Neural MechanismsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Contextual control of appetite. Renewal of inhibited food-seeking behavior in sated rats after extinction

Open access
Todd, Travis P., Winterbauer, Neil E., Bouton, Mark E.·2012·Appetite

Abstract

Obesity and overeating have become fundamental problems in modern society. This article studies the inhibition of food-seeking behavior, and how contextual cues can control it. Rats that had free food in the home cage nevertheless learned to lever press for sucrose or high-fat pellets in a distinctive context (a Skinner box). Lever pressing was then inhibited by extinction, in which lever presses no longer produced food. After extinction, inhibited responding was "renewed" when the rats were switched to a different context: in the new context, the rats lever-pressed again, and worked more for food when food was made available. These effects were observed when conditioning, extinction and testing occurred in contexts A, B, and A (respectively) or in A, A, and B. Thus, mere removal from the context in which food-seeking was inhibited initiated a return to food-seeking. The contextual control of extinction may help explain why food seeking and consumption seem so persistent.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appet.2011.12.006

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bouton ME 2004 Context and behavioral processes in extinction Learning and Memory 11 485 494 15466298

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Todd, T. P., Winterbauer, N. E., & Bouton, M. E.
Affiliations
University of Vermont (US)
Corresponding author
Bouton, Mark E.
Venue
Appetite
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-04
Volume
58
Issue
2
Pages
484-489
ISSN
0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077350071
Cited by
60
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Appetite (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH064847)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
food-seeking behavior, extinction, contextual control, renewal, satiety, appetite regulation, obesity, overeating, sucrose, lever pressing
MeSH terms
Animals, Appetite Regulation, Appetitive Behavior, Behavior, Animal, Dietary Fats, Extinction, Psychological, Feeding Behavior, Female, Satiation, Self Administration, Sucrose, Rats, Wistar, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review