Cited by 341Regulation of Appetite and ObesityNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Conditioned cues elicit feeding in sated rats: a role for learning in meal initiation.

Weingarten, Harvey P.·1983·Science

Abstract

Pavlovian conditioning was used to teach rats an association between an arbitrary external cue and food. Presentation of the conditioned cue elicited feeding by sated animals. The meal constituted approximately 20 percent of daily intake, and it was compensated for by a reduction of subsequent intake.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.6836286

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If extra pairing with food consumption while hungry is given, then later the Pavlovian food cue can evoke conditioned eating even if encountered when the rat is no longer hungry.

    “However, if that extra pairing with food consumption while hungry is given, then later the Pavlovian food cue can evoke conditioned eating even if encountered when the rat is no longer hungry (Weingarten, 1983; Holland et al., 2002; Petrovich, 2011).”

    From Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation (2018) · cites this paper as Weingarten, 1983

  • The OFC supports conditioned-cue-elicited feeding.

    “The OFC plays a role in learning stimulus-reinforcement associations and conditioning (118,119), supports conditioned-cue-elicited feeding (120) and probably contributes to overeating irrespective of hunger signals (121).”

    From Obesity and addiction: Neurobiological overlaps (2013) · cites this paper as [120]

  • The OFC plays a role in learning stimulus-reinforcement associations and conditioning, supports conditioned-cue elicited feeding, and probably contributes to overeating irrespective of hunger signals.

    “The OFC plays a role in learning stimulus-reinforcement associations and conditioning (Cox et al 2005;Gallagher et al 1999), supports conditioned-cue elicited feeding (Weingarten 1983), and probably contributes to overeating irrespective of hunger signals (Ogden and Wardle 1990).”

    From Food and Drug Reward: Overlapping Circuits in Human Obesity and Addiction (2011) · cites this paper as Weingarten 1983

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weingarten, H. P.
Affiliations
McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Weingarten, Harvey P.
Venue
Science
Published
1983-04-22
Volume
220
Issue
4595
Pages
431-433
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2049392123
Cited by
341
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 20
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
classical conditioning, conditioned cues, feeding behavior, satiety, meal initiation, dietary intake, associative learning, rats
MeSH terms
Animals, Conditioning, Classical, Eating, Energy Metabolism, Feeding Behavior, Humans, Male, Satiation, Vagotomy, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review