The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consumers’ perception of organic product characteristics. A review
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Who are organic food consumers? A compilation and review of why people purchase organic food
Hughner, R. S., McDonagh, P., Prothero, A., Shultz, C. J., & Stanton, J. (2007) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.210 · Cited by 1,754
Personal determinants of organic food consumption: a review
Aertsens, J., Verbeke, W., Mondelaers, K., & Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2009) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/00070700910992961 · Cited by 1,067
The World of Organic Agriculture: Statistics and Emerging Trends 2008
(2008) · Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/meq.2008.08319fae.004 · Cited by 998
Grunert, K. G., Bredahl, L., & Brunsø, K. (2004) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/s0309-1740(03)00130-x · Cited by 862
Attitudes towards organic foods among Swedish consumers
Magnusson, M. K., Arvola, A., Koivisto Hursti, U., Åberg, L., & Sjödén, P. (2001) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/00070700110386755 · Cited by 846
Consumer motivations in the purchase of organic food: A means‐end approach
Zanoli, R., & Naspetti, S. (2002) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/00070700210425930 · Cited by 776
Janssen, M., & Hamm, U. (2012) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.12.004 · Cited by 649
Self-citationEthical values and motives driving organic food choice
Honkanen, P., Verplanken, B., & Olsen, S. O. (2006) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.190 · Cited by 626
Johne, A. (1992) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/0166-4972(92)90011-6 · Cited by 615
Preference for green packaging in consumer product choices – Do consumers care?
Rokka, J., & Uusitalo, L. (2008) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2008.00710.x · Cited by 463
Cited by
Service quality delivery through web sites: a critical review of extant knowledge
Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., & Malhotra, A. (2002) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/009207002236911 · Cited by 2,729
Nuttavuthisit, K., & Thøgersen, J. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2690-5 · Cited by 722
Towards better representation of organic agriculture in life cycle assessment
van der Werf, H. M. G., Knudsen, M. T., & Cederberg, C. (2020) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-020-0489-6 · Cited by 394
Liobikienė, G., & Bernatonienė, J. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.204 · Cited by 310
Impact of sustainability perception on consumption of organic meat and meat substitutes
Siegrist, M., & Hartmann, C. (2019) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2018.09.016 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Schleenbecker, R., & Hamm, U.
- Venue
- Appetite
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 71
- Pages
- 420-429
- ISSN
- 0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1983162532
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 15.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consumers’ perception of organic product characteristics. A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.appet.2013.08.020
- The paper
- Schleenbecker, R., & Hamm, U. (2013). Consumers’ perception of organic product characteristics. A review. Appetite. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2013.08.020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
