The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Personal determinants of organic food consumption: a review
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: A lot of literature is available that discusses personal determinants of organic food consumption. However different models and determinants are used in the literature. This paper aims to provide an overview, within a framework linking Schwartz' values theory and the theory of planned behaviour (TPB). Also it seeks to focus on the importance of affective attitude, emotions, personal norm, involvement and uncertainty related to organic food consumption. Design/methodology/approach: The paper is based on secondary data sources, namely the literature concerning personal determinants of organic food consumption. Findings: Both the values theory and the theory of planned behaviour have been referred to as relevant theories for better understanding consumers' choice for organic food. Organic food consumption decisions can be explained by relating attributes of organic food with more abstract values such as “security”, “hedonism”, “universalism”, “benevolence”, “stimulation”, “self‐direction” and “conformity”. Appealing to these values can positively influence attitudes towards organic food consumption. Besides attitude, subjective and personal norm and (perceived) behavioural control influence consumption of organic food. Research limitations/implications: More research related to the role of uncertainty (reduction) during the process of buying organic food is recommended. Practical implications: Relatively little research has examined the affective component of attitude and emotions in relation to organic food consumption, while these may play an important role as drivers of involvement and thus help to jolt food purchasers out of their routine of buying conventional food and set a first step to adopt organic food. Originality/value: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first paper providing a comprehensive overview and linking the literature on organic food consumption to the values theory and the theory of planned behaviour, including the role of personal norm and focusing on emotions. The proposed integration of mental processing in an organic food consumption model leads to interesting hypotheses and recommendations for policy makers, researchers and stakeholders involved in the organic food market.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Schwartz, S. H. (1992) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60281-6 · Cited by 14,619
Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic review
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466601164939 · Cited by 9,970
New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior
Stern, P. C. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00175 · Cited by 8,682
Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002 · Cited by 4,140
Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review and Avenues for Further Research
Conner, M., & Armitage, C. J. (1998) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01685.x · Cited by 3,344
Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer “attitude–behavioral intention” gap
Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2006) · Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10806-005-5485-3 · Cited by 2,524
Self-citationPadel, S., & Foster, C. (2005) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/00070700510611002 · Cited by 1,214
Subjective norms, attitudes and intentions of Finnish consumers in buying organic food
Tarkiainen, A., & Sundqvist, S. (2005) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/00070700510629760 · Cited by 1,054
Magnusson, M. K., Arvola, A., Hursti, U.-K. K., Åberg, L., & Sjödén, P.-O. (2003) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/s0195-6663(03)00002-3 · Cited by 941
Cited by
Sustainability labels on food products: consumer motivation, understanding and use
Grunert, K. G., Hieke, S., & Wills, J. (2014) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.12.001 · Cited by 1,334
Mende, M., Scott, M. L., van Doorn, J., Grewal, D., & Shanks, I. (2019) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/0022243718822827 · Cited by 1,197
Consumer-related food waste: causes and potential for action
Aschemann-Witzel, J., De Hooge, I., Amani, P., Bech-Larsen, T., & Oostindjer, M. (2015) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su7066457 · Cited by 910
“Based on this exercise and in consideration of (food-related) consumer behavior or household models [18–22], a model of the potential relations was developed and used as a point of departure in the interviews.”
MethodNuttavuthisit, K., & Thøgersen, J. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2690-5 · Cited by 722
Janssen, M., & Hamm, U. (2012) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.12.004 · Cited by 649
Metadata
- Authors
- Aertsens, J., Verbeke, W., Mondelaers, K., & Van Huylenbroeck, G.
- Venue
- British Food Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2009-09-26
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1140-1167
- ISSN
- 0007-070X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2031704246
- Cited by
- 1,067
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 29.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Personal determinants of organic food consumption: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/00070700910992961
- The paper
- Aertsens, J., Verbeke, W., Mondelaers, K., & Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2009). Personal determinants of organic food consumption: a review. British Food Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700910992961
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.