Cited by 53Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Behavioral evidence of emotion dysregulation in binge eaters

Eichen, Dawn M., Chen, Eunice, Boutelle, Kerri N., McCloskey, Michael S.·2017·Appetite

Abstract

Binge eating is the most common disordered eating symptom and can lead to the development of obesity. Previous self-report research has supported the hypothesis that individuals who binge eat report greater levels of general emotion dysregulation, which may facilitate binge-eating behavior. However, to date, no study has experimentally tested the relation between binge eating history and in-vivo emotion dysregulation. To do this, a sample of female college students who either endorsed binge eating (n = 40) or denied the presence of any eating pathology (n = 47) completed the Difficulties with Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) and a behavioral distress tolerance task (the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task-Computer: PASAT-C) known to induce negative affect and distress. The binge eating group was 2.96 times more likely to quit the PASAT-C early (χ 2 = 5.04, p = 0.025) and reported greater irritability (F(1,84) = 7.09 p = 0.009) and frustration (F(1,84) = 5.00, p = 0.028) after completing the PASAT-C than controls, controlling for initial levels of these emotions. Furthermore, across the entire sample, quitting early was associated with greater emotion dysregulation on the DERS (r pb = 0.342, p < 0.01). This study is the first to demonstrate that individuals who binge eat show in-vivo emotional dysregulation on a laboratory task. Future studies should examine the PASAT-C to determine its potential clinical utility for individuals with or at risk of developing binge eating.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appet.2016.12.021

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies have demonstrated the expected negative association between DT and DEB.

    “While several studies have demonstrated the expected negative association between DT and DEB (Anestis et al., 2007(Anestis et al., , 2012b;;Eichen et al., 2017), others have not been able to replicate this relationship (Kelly et al., 2014;Yiu et al., 2018).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eichen, D. M., Chen, E., Boutelle, K. N., & McCloskey, M. S.
Affiliations
  • Temple University (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Eichen, Dawn M.
Venue
Appetite
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-04
Volume
111
Pages
1-6
ISSN
0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2565175956
Cited by
53
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3
FWCI
7.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Appetite (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
binge eating, emotional dysregulation, distress tolerance, Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test, negative affect, irritability, frustration, disordered eating, female university students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Bulimia, Eating, Emotions, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Students, Task Performance and Analysis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review