Cited by 197Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesAnimal and Plant Science Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A preliminary model of human-animal relationships in the zoo

Open access
Hosey, Geoff·2008·Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Abstract

The concept of the human–animal relationship (HAR) is widely used in farm animal research to describe the outcome of the different qualities and quantities of interaction between stockpersons and the animals in their care. Thus, negative, positive or neutral HARs may result from the effect of mostly negative (e.g. rough handling), neutral (e.g. no handling) or positive (e.g. gentle handling) interactions. In this paper the concept is applied to zoo animals in an attempt to provide a model not only of HARs between zoo animals and keepers, but also between zoo animals and unfamiliar people, primarily the visiting public. Behavioural responses of animals to zoo visitors are inconsistent both within and between taxa, and the history of interactions the individual animal has experienced, and hence the HARs it has developed, may be one of the variables that leads to this inconsistency. The model starts, like the farm animal models, with the animals’ fear of humans, which is itself dependent upon species. The subsequent history of interactions the animal experiences, both with familiar and unfamiliar people, then determines the animal's HAR, which in turn influences the way the animal responds to people. There are currently insufficient data to test the model, but predictions of the model are identified here which could be used to test it.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.applanim.2007.04.013

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 98 references

3 of the 98 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Keane, C.W., 2005. The effects of zoo visitors on the behaviour of Western Lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) Citron-Crested (Cacatua sulphurea citrinocristata) and Moluccan Cockatoos (Cacatua moluccensis). Unpublished M.Sc. thesis, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
  2. Maki, 1987, The effects of unfamiliar humans on aggression in captive chimpanzee groups, Am. J. Primatol., 12, 358
  3. Mather, L., 1999. Response of Captive Orang Utans to Human Audiences. Unpublished M. Phil. Thesis, University of Manchester (Bolton Institute), Bolton, UK.
  4. Perret, 1995, Einfluss von Zoobesuchern auf das verhalten von schimpansen (Pan troglodytes), Der Zool. Garten N. F., 65, 314
  5. Skyner, 2004, The effect of visitors on the self-injurious behaviour of a male pileated gibbon (Hylobates pileatus), Der Zool. Garten NF, 74, 38
  6. Wormell, 1996, Pied tamarins Saguinus bicolor bicolor at the Jersey Wildlife Preservation Trust: management, behaviour and reproduction, Dodo, J. Wildl. Preserv. Trusts, 32, 76

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–197 of 197

Metadata

Authors
Hosey, G.
Affiliations
University of Greater Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Hosey, Geoff
Venue
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-02
Volume
109
Issue
2-4
Pages
105-127
ISSN
0168-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062787023
Cited by
197
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Applied Animal Behaviour Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Animal and Plant Science Education
Keywords
human-animal relations, zoo animals, zoo visitors, fear of humans, species differences, zoo animal welfare

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review