Cited by 29Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesPrimate Behavior and EcologyWildlife Ecology and Conservation

Assessing inactivity in zoo gorillas using keeper ratings and behavioral data

Less, Elena Hoellein, Kuhar, Christopher W., Dennis, Patricia M., Lukas, Kristen E.·2012·Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.applanim.2012.01.001

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Less, E. H., Kuhar, C. W., Dennis, P. M., & Lukas, K. E.
Affiliations
Cleveland Metroparks Zoo (US)
Corresponding author
Less, Elena Hoellein
Venue
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-02
Volume
137
Issue
1-2
Pages
74-79
ISSN
0168-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063990357
Cited by
29
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Animal Behaviour Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
Columbus Zoo and Aquarium
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
western lowland gorilla, Gorilla gorilla gorilla, zoo animals, activity level, inactivity, immobility, idle time, behavioral data collection, inter-rater reliability, multi-institutional study, zoo animal welfare

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review