Cited by 13Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesVeterinary Pharmacology and AnesthesiaWildlife Ecology and Conservation

Developing a reliable welfare assessment tool for captive hibernatory bear species

Open access
Maher, Chloe J., Gibson, Angela, Dixon, Laura M., Bacon, Heather·2021·Animals

Abstract

Animal welfare assessments are essential for the identification of welfare hazards and benchmarking of welfare improvements, though welfare assessments for zoo species are lacking. Bears are commonly housed in zoos but currently no composite welfare assessment tool exists for captive bears. This study describes the development of such a tool for use across hibernating bear species. A draft tool was developed using indicators derived from the literature and a modified Delphi analysis with an international group of bear keepers. A total of 18 bear keepers from 12 zoos were recruited to trial the tool on 24 brown bears and American black bears. The participating keepers assessed their bears three times across a period of nine days. Intraclass correlation coefficients analysis was used to analyse inter-, intra-rater and item reliability. The inter- and intra-rater reliability showed good to excellent levels of agreement (>0.7, p < 0.05). Item reliability was also assessed and showed good to excellent levels of agreement (>0.75, p < 0.05). The resulting bear welfare assessment is an important step in identifying and understanding challenges to bear welfare in captivity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ani11113090

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [8]Garshelis D.L. Chapter 4: Variation in Ursid Life Histories, Is There an Outlier? Giant Pandas: Biology and Conservation Lindburg D. Baragona K. University of California Press California, CA, USA 2004 53 73
  2. [28]Sergiel A. Maślak R. Part II: The Welfare of Zoo Animals, Chapter 4: The welfare of captive bears The Welfare of Animals in Zoos and EU Legal Standards Gardocka T. Gruszczyńska A. Maślak R. Sergiel A. ELIPSA Warsaw, Poland 2014 129 139
  3. [50]Gibson A. Assessing Quality of life in bears Proceedings of the Advancing Bear Care Omaha, NE, USA 8 October 2016 38
  4. [51]Bacon H. Gibson A. Bear Welfare Assessment Proceedings of the Advancing Bear Care Livingston, UK 10 October 2019 29 31
  5. [73]Forde J. The Development and Benefits of Captive Torpor in European Brown Bears Proceedings of the Advancing Bear Care Livingston, UK 10 October 2019 41

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maher, C. J., Gibson, A., Dixon, L. M., & Bacon, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • The Oakland Zoo, 9777 Golf Links Rd, Oakland, CA 94605, USA
  • Roslin Institute (GB)
  • University of Lancashire (GB)
Corresponding author
Maher, Chloe J.
Venue
Animals
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-10-29
Volume
11
Issue
11
Pages
3090
ISSN
2076-2615 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3210617831
Cited by
13
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Animals (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CLOK (University of Central Lancashire) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
European Association of Zoos and Aquaria
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
animal welfare assessment, captive bears, hibernation, zoo animals, brown bear, Ursus americanus, welfare indicators, Delphi method, inter-rater reliability, intra-rater reliability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review