Monitoring the behavior and habitat use of animals to enhance welfare using the ZooMonitor app
Open accessAbstract
Regular monitoring of the behavior, habitat use, and appearance of animals can provide valuable insight into their welfare.These ongoing data can help identify meaningful trends that can be acted upon to enhance welfare, and potentially reveal individual preferences and patterns that can facilitate care tailored to the individual.To provide a low cost, flexible, user-friendly tool for staff to conduct systematic behavioral monitoring, Lincoln Park Zoo, with development support from Zier Niemann Consulting, created the ZooMonitor app.With ZooMonitor, users can record the behavior and habitat use of animals using standardized animal behavior recording methods as well as log individual characteristics such as body condition or coat/feather quality.These data can be recorded using computers or tablet devices, and data are uploaded to a cloud server where the user can conduct automated reliability tests to check observer consistency and generate built-in reports such as activity budgets and heat maps showing how animals use their available space.To demonstrate the use of ZooMonitor in an ongoing monitoring program, two case studies from Lincoln Park Zoo are presented: 1) promoting increased foraging and broader habitat use of pygmy hippos (Choeropsis liberiensis); and 2) tracking feather condition changes in a flock of domestic chickens (Gallus gallus).These examples highlight the importance of standardized monitoring and use of digital tools like ZooMonitor to enable science-based husbandry practices and promote positive welfare for animals in human care.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ZooMonitor has been adopted by over 200 institutions.
“ZooMonitor has been adopted by over 200 institutions (72)”
From Comparison of animal welfare assessment tools and methodologies: need for an effective approach for captive elephants in Asia (2024) · cites this paper as [72]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Observational study of behavior: sampling methods
Altmann, J. (1974) · Behaviour · doi:10.1163/156853974x00534 · Cited by 13,891 · see citing works
Friard, O., & Gamba, M. (2016) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12584 · Cited by 3,419 · see citing works
The Observer: A software system for collection and analysis of observational data
Noldus, L. P. J. J. (1991) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03203406 · Cited by 477 · see citing works
New directions for zoo animal welfare science
Whitham, J. C., & Wielebnowski, N. (2013) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2013.02.004 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Measuring zoo animal welfare: theory and practice
Hill, S. P., & Broom, D. M. (2009) · Zoo Biology · doi:10.1002/zoo.20276 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Melfi, V. A. (2009) · Zoo Biology · doi:10.1002/zoo.20288 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
The 24/7 approach to promoting optimal welfare for captive wild animals
Brando, S., & Buchanan-Smith, H. M. (2018) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2017.09.010 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Lattin, C. R., Reed, J. M., DesRochers, D. W., & Romero, L. M. (2011) · Journal of Avian Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-048x.2010.05310.x · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Animal-based welfare monitoring: using keeper ratings as an assessment tool
Whitham, J. C., & Wielebnowski, N. (2009) · Zoo Biology · doi:10.1002/zoo.20281 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Behavioral monitoring in zoos and aquariums: a tool for guiding husbandry and directing research
Watters, J. V., Margulis, S. W., & Atsalis, S. (2008) · Zoo Biology · doi:10.1002/zoo.20207 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Using technology to monitor and improve zoo animal welfare
Whitham, J., & Miller, L. (2016) · Animal Welfare · doi:10.7120/09627286.25.4.395 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Association Between Plumage Condition and Fear and Stress Levels in Five Breeds of Chickens
Campo, J. L., Gil, M. G., Torres, O., et al. (2001) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1093/ps/80.5.549 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Assessing inactivity in zoo gorillas using keeper ratings and behavioral data
Less, E. H., Kuhar, C. W., Dennis, P. M., & Lukas, K. E. (2012) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2012.01.001 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Kjær, J. B., Glawatz, H. M. H., Scholz, B., Rettenbacher, S., & Tauson, R. (2011) · British Poultry Science · doi:10.1080/00071668.2011.554799 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Flacke, G. L., Chambers, B. K., Martin, G. B., & Paris, M. C. J. (2015) · Der Zoologische Garten · doi:10.1016/j.zoolgart.2015.07.006 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Hansen, B. K., Fultz, A. L., Hopper, L. M., et al. (2018) · Zoo Biology · doi:10.1002/zoo.21410 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Martin, P., & Bateson, P. (2007). Measuring behavior: An introductory guide (3 rd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Welfare assessment tools in zoos: from theory to practice
Jones, N., Sherwen, S. L., Robbins, R., McLelland, D. J., & Whittaker, A. L. (2022) · Veterinary Sciences · doi:10.3390/vetsci9040170 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Saiyed, S. T., Hopper, L. M., & Cronin, K. A. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani9060326 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationLaDue, C. A., Vandercone, R. P. G., Kiso, W. K., & Freeman, E. W. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12091215 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Mapping shade availability and use in zoo environments: a tool for evaluating thermal comfort
Wark, J. D., Wierzal, N. K., & Cronin, K. A. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10071189 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Self-citationFazio, J. M., Barthel, T., Freeman, E. W., Garlick-Ott, K., Scholle, A., & Brown, J. L. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10112026 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
LaDue, C. A., Hunt, K. E., Samaraweera, M. G. S. M., Vandercone, R. P. G., Kiso, W. K., & Freeman, E. W. (2022) · Theriogenology Wild · doi:10.1016/j.therwi.2022.100011 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Ghimire, R., Brown, J. L., Thitaram, C., & Bansiddhi, P. (2024) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2024.1370909 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Galante, J., & Margulis, S. W. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12213031 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wark, J. D., Cronin, K. A., Niemann, T., Shender, M. A., Horrigan, A., Kao, A., & Ross, M. R.
- Affiliations
- Lincoln Park Zoo (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wark, Jason D.
- Venue
- Animal Behavior and Cognition
- Publisher
- Animal Behavior and Cognition
- Published
- 2019-06-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 158-167
- ISSN
- 2372-4323 (ISSN-L)
- 2372-5052
- OpenAlex
- W2964908459
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 13.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Animal Behavior and Cognition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Institute of Museum and Library Services
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Keywords
- animal welfare monitoring, behavioral monitoring, habitat use, zoo animals, observer reliability, activity budget, heatmaps, Choeropsis liberiensis, chickens, feather condition, husbandry practices, Lincoln Park Zoo
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review