The DOI matches its Crossref record; 105 of the 106 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why 90% of clinical drug development fails and how to improve it?
Open accessAbstract
Ninety percent of clinical drug development fails despite implementation of many successful strategies, which raised the question whether certain aspects in target validation and drug optimization are overlooked? Current drug optimization overly emphasizes potency/specificity using structure‒activity-relationship (SAR) but overlooks tissue exposure/selectivity in disease/normal tissues using structure‒tissue exposure/selectivity-relationship (STR), which may mislead the drug candidate selection and impact the balance of clinical dose/efficacy/toxicity. We propose structure‒tissue exposure/selectivity-activity relationship (STAR) to improve drug optimization, which classifies drug candidates based on drug's potency/selectivity, tissue exposure/selectivity, and required dose for balancing clinical efficacy/toxicity. Class I drugs have high specificity/potency and high tissue exposure/selectivity, which needs low dose to achieve superior clinical efficacy/safety with high success rate. Class II drugs have high specificity/potency and low tissue exposure/selectivity, which requires high dose to achieve clinical efficacy with high toxicity and needs to be cautiously evaluated. Class III drugs have relatively low (adequate) specificity/potency but high tissue exposure/selectivity, which requires low dose to achieve clinical efficacy with manageable toxicity but are often overlooked. Class IV drugs have low specificity/potency and low tissue exposure/selectivity, which achieves inadequate efficacy/safety, and should be terminated early. STAR may improve drug optimization and clinical studies for the success of clinical drug development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Despite these investments, less than 1% of compounds are expected to enter clinical trials, let alone reach the market.13–15”
From Drug repurposing for cancer therapy (2024) · cites this paper as [15]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“As such, it takes 10–15 years and costs $1–2 billion to produce a new drug approved for clinical use.”
From Drug repurposing for cancer therapy (2024) · cites this paper as [15]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Wang, M., Cao, R., Zhang, L., Yang, X., Liu, J., Xu, M., Shi, Z., Hú, Z., Zhong, W., & Xiao, G. (2020) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/s41422-020-0282-0 · Cited by 6,994
Lead- and drug-like compounds: the rule-of-five revolution
Lipinski, C. A. (2004) · Drug Discovery Today Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.ddtec.2004.11.007 · Cited by 6,455
Amidon, G. L., Lennernäs, H., Shah, V. P., & Crison, J. R. (1995) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1023/a:1016212804288 · Cited by 5,430
Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates?
Kola, I., & Landis, J. (2004) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1470 · Cited by 4,167
Membrane transporters in drug development
The International Transporter Consortium, Giacomini, K. M., Huang, S.-M., Tweedie, D. J., Benet, L. Z., Brouwer, K. L. R., Chu, X., Dahlin, A., Evers, R., Fischer, V., et al. (2010) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3028 · Cited by 3,340
Bhatia, S. N., & Ingber, D. E. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2989 · Cited by 3,305
Applications of machine learning in drug discovery and development
Vamathevan, J., Clark, D., Czodrowski, P., Dunham, I., Ferran, E., Lee, G., Li, B., Madabhushi, A., Shah, P., Spitzer, M., et al. (2019) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-019-0024-5 · Cited by 3,228
Principles of early drug discovery
Hughes, J., Rees, S., Kalindjian, S., & Philpott, K. (2011) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.01127.x · Cited by 2,859
Kinase drug discovery 20 years after imatinib: progress and future directions
Cohen, P., Cross, D. A. E., & Janne, P. A. (2021) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-021-00195-4 · Cited by 1,092
Drug discovery with explainable artificial intelligence
Jiménez-Luna, J., Grisoni, F., & Schneider, G. (2020) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-020-00236-4 · Cited by 1,063
Artificial intelligence in drug development: Present status and future prospects
Mak, K.-K., & Pichika, M. R. (2019) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2018.11.014 · Cited by 1,018
Advances in organ-on-a-chip engineering
Zhang, B., Korolj, A., Lai, B. F. L., & Radisic, M. (2018) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-018-0034-7 · Cited by 1,017
Molecular profiling for precision cancer therapies
Malone, E. R., Oliva, M., Sabatini, P. J. B., Stockley, T. L., & Siu, L. L. (2020) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-019-0703-1 · Cited by 982
Opportunities and challenges in phenotypic drug discovery: an industry perspective
Moffat, J. G., Vincent, F., Lee, J. A., Eder, J., & Prunotto, M. (2017) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2017.111 · Cited by 939
de Wit, E., Feldmann, F., Cronin, J., Jordan, R., Okumura, A., Thomas, T., Scott, D. P., Cihlář, T., & Feldmann, H. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1922083117 · Cited by 888
Drug-Like Properties: Concepts, Structure Design and Methods from ADME to Toxicity Optimization
Kerns, E. H., & Di, L. (2016) · Cited by 784
Off-target toxicity is a common mechanism of action of cancer drugs undergoing clinical trials
Lin, A., Giuliano, C. J., Palladino, A. C., John, K. M., Abramowicz, C., Yuan, M. L., Sausville, E. L., Lukow, D. A., Liu, L., Chait, A. R., et al. (2019) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aaw8412 · Cited by 769
Evans, D. C., Watt, A. P., Nicoll‐Griffith, D. A., & Baillie, T. A. (2003) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx034170b · Cited by 708
Byrd, J. C., Hillmen, P., Ghia, P., Kater, A. P., Chanan-Khan, A., Furman, R. R., O'Brien, S. M., Yenerel, M. N., Illés, Á., Kay, N. E., et al. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.21.01210 · Cited by 676
Quantifying the Ligand-Coated Nanoparticle Delivery to Cancer Cells in Solid Tumors
Dai, Q., Wilhelm, S., Ding, D., Syed, A. M., Sindhwani, S., Zhang, Y., Chen, Y. Y., MacMillan, P., & Chan, W. C. W. (2018) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b03900 · Cited by 672
Trends in clinical success rates and therapeutic focus
Dowden, H., & Munro, J. (2019) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/d41573-019-00074-z · Cited by 649 · cited 6×
“The “rule of 5” have been considered in chemical structure design: (1) less than 5 H-bond donors; (2) molecular weight less than 500; (3) cLogP less than 5; (4) less than 10 H-bond acceptors(31).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPhase II and phase III failures: 2013–2015
Harrison, R. K. (2016) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2016.184 · Cited by 636
Sharman, J. P., Egyed, M., Jurczak, W. J., Skarbnik, A. P. Z., Pagel, J. M., Flinn, I. W., Kamdar, M. K., Munir, T., Walewska, R. J., Corbett, G., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30262-2 · Cited by 632
Molecular representations in AI-driven drug discovery: a review and practical guide
David, L., Thakkar, A., Mercado, R., & Engkvist, O. (2020) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-020-00460-5 · Cited by 587
The determination and interpretation of the therapeutic index in drug development
Muller, P. Y., & Milton, M. (2012) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3801 · Cited by 584
Harrington, K. J., Mohammadtaghi, S., Uster, P. S., Glass, D. M., Peters, A. M., Vile, R. G., & Stewart, J. S. W. (2001) · PubMed · Cited by 575
Inoue, A., Kobayashi, K., Maemondo, M., Sugawara, S., Oizumi, S., Isobe, H., Gemma, A., Harada, M., Yoshizawa, H., Kinoshita, I., et al. (2013) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mds214 · Cited by 540
Davis, K. D., Aghaeepour, N., Ahn, A. H., Angst, M. S., Borsook, D., Brenton, A., Burczynski, M. E., Crean, C. S., Edwards, R. R., Gaudilliere, B. L., et al. (2020) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/s41582-020-0362-2 · Cited by 528
A review on machine learning approaches and trends in drug discovery
Carracedo-Reboredo, P., Liñares-Blanco, J., Rodríguez-Fernández, N., Cedrón, F., Novoa, F. J., Carballal, A., Maojo, V., Pazos, A., & Fernandez-Lozano, C. (2021) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2021.08.011 · Cited by 517
Herland, A., Maoz, B. M., Das, D., Somayaji, M. R., Prantil‐Baun, R., Novak, R., Cronce, M. J., Huffstater, T. M., Jeanty, S. S. F., Ingram, M., et al. (2020) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-019-0498-9 · Cited by 511
Transporters as a determinant of drug clearance and tissue distribution
Shitara, Y., Horie, T., & Sugiyama, Y. (2006) · European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2005.12.003 · Cited by 494
Cornerstones of CRISPR–Cas in drug discovery and therapy
Fellmann, C., Gowen, B. G., Lin, P., Doudna, J. A., & Corn, J. E. (2016) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2016.238 · Cited by 452
Sun, D., Lennernäs, H., Welage, L. S., Barnett, J. L., Landowski, C. P., Foster, D. R., Fleisher, D., Lee, K., & Amidon, G. L. (2002) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1023/a:1020483911355 · Cited by 451
Self-citationPlasma protein binding: From discovery to development
Bohnert, T., & Gan, L.-S. L. (2013) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.23614 · Cited by 435
Applied Concepts in PBPK Modeling: How to Build a PBPK/PD Model
Kuepfer, L., Niederalt, C., Wendl, T., Schlender, J., Willmann, S., Lippert, J., Block, M., Eissing, T., & Teutonico, D. (2016) · CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology · doi:10.1002/psp4.12134 · Cited by 425
PBPK modeling and simulation in drug research and development
Zhuang, X., & Lu, C. (2016) · Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B · doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2016.04.004 · Cited by 411
Maximov, P. Y., Lee, T. M., & Jordan, V. C. (2013) · Current Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.2174/1574884711308020006 · Cited by 387
Northfelt, D., Martin, F. J., Working, P. K., Volberding, P. A., Russell, J., Newman, M., Amantea, M., & Kaplan, L. D. (1996) · The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1002/j.1552-4604.1996.tb04152.x · Cited by 377
General approach for the calculation of tissue to plasma partition coefficients
Schmitt, W. (2008) · Toxicology in Vitro · doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2007.09.010 · Cited by 349
MICE Models: Superior to the HERG Model in Predicting Torsade de Pointes
Kramer, J., Obejero‐Paz, C. A., Myatt, G. J., Kuryshev, Y. A., Bruening‐Wright, A., Verducci, J. S., & Brown, A. M. (2013) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep02100 · Cited by 340
Drug-Like Property Concepts in Pharmaceutical Design
Di, L., Kerns, E. H., & Carter, G. T. (2009) · Current Pharmaceutical Design · doi:10.2174/138161209788682479 · Cited by 329
Positron emission tomography molecular imaging for drug development
Matthews, P. M., Rabiner, E. A., Passchier, J., & Gunn, R. N. (2011) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04085.x · Cited by 322
Drug–Target Kinetics in Drug Discovery
Tonge, P. J. (2017) · ACS Chemical Neuroscience · doi:10.1021/acschemneuro.7b00185 · Cited by 304
Keller, M., Montgomery, S., Ball, W., Morrison, M., Snavely, D., Liu, G., Hargreaves, R., Hietala, J., Lines, C., Beebe, K., et al. (2006) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.07.013 · Cited by 286
What Went Wrong with Anticancer Nanomedicine Design and How to Make It Right
Sun, D., Zhou, S. Y., & Gao, W. (2020) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.9b09713 · Cited by 273
Self-citationTakebe, T., Imai, R., & Ono, S. (2018) · Clinical and Translational Science · doi:10.1111/cts.12577 · Cited by 257
Current industrial practices of assessing permeability and P-glycoprotein interaction
Balimane, P. V., Han, Y., & Chong, S. (2006) · The AAPS Journal · doi:10.1208/aapsj080101 · Cited by 254
Selective estrogen receptor modulators: tissue specificity and clinical utility
Arnott, J. A., Martinkovich, S. C., Planey, S. L., & Shah, D. (2014) · Clinical Interventions in Aging · doi:10.2147/cia.s66690 · Cited by 252
Kiriiri, G. K., Njogu, P., & Mwangi, A. (2020) · Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1186/s43094-020-00047-9 · Cited by 244
Improving target assessment in biomedical research: the GOT-IT recommendations
Emmerich, C. H., Martinez‐Gamboa, L., Hofmann, M. C. J., Bonin, M., Arbach, O., Schendel, P., Gerlach, B., Hempel, K., Bespalov, A., Dirnagl, U., et al. (2020) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-020-0087-3 · Cited by 243
Guo, W., Qi, X., Yu, X., Liu, Y., Chung, C.-I., Bai, F., Lin, X., Lu, D., Wang, L., Chen, J., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17997-6 · Cited by 228
Mechanistic enzymology in drug discovery: a fresh perspective
Holdgate, G. A., Meek, T. D., & Grimley, R. L. (2017) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2017.219 · Cited by 227
Accelerating Therapeutics for Opportunities in Medicine: A Paradigm Shift in Drug Discovery
Hinkson, I. V., Madej, B. D., & Stahlberg, E. A. (2020) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2020.00770 · Cited by 191
Activity Landscape Representations for Structure−Activity Relationship Analysis
Wassermann, A. M., Wawer, M. J., & Bajorath, J. (2010) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm100933w · Cited by 184
Zhang, X., Yang, Y., Grimstein, M., Fan, J., Grillo, J. A., Huang, S. M., Zhu, H., & Wang, Y. (2020) · The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1002/jcph.1767 · Cited by 183
Erratum: Mechanistic enzymology in drug discovery: a fresh perspective
Holdgate, G. A., Meek, T. D., & Grimley, R. L. (2017) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2017.257 · Cited by 182
Mao, J., Akhtar, J., Zhang, X., Sun, L., Guan, S., Li, X., Chen, G., Liu, J., Jeon, H.-N., Kim, M. S., et al. (2021) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.103052 · Cited by 179
An overview of current and emerging SERMs
Komm, B. S., & Mirkin, S. (2014) · The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jsbmb.2014.03.003 · Cited by 178
Human radiolabeled mass balance studies: objectives, utilities and limitations
Penner, N. A., Klunk, L. J., & Prakash, C. (2009) · Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition · doi:10.1002/bdd.661 · Cited by 152
Importance of Relating Efficacy Measures to Unbound Drug Concentrations for Anti-Infective Agents
González, D., Schmidt, S., & Derendorf, H. (2013) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00092-12 · Cited by 151
Recent Advances in Carrier-mediated Hepatic Uptake and Biliary Excretion of Xenobiotics
Yamazaki, M., Suzuki, H., & Sugiyama, Y. (1996) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1023/a:1016077517241 · Cited by 138
Considering the impact drug-like properties have on the chance of success
Yusof, I., & Segall, M. (2013) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2013.02.008 · Cited by 137
Importance of Drug Pharmacokinetics at the Site of Action
Rizk, M. L., Zou, L., Savić, R. M., & Dooley, K. E. (2017) · Clinical and Translational Science · doi:10.1111/cts.12448 · Cited by 137
Zhang, D., Hop, C. E. C. A., Patilea-Vrana, G., Gampa, G., Seneviratne, H. K., Unadkat, J. D., Kenny, J. R., Nagapudi, K., Di, L., Zhou, L., et al. (2019) · Drug Metabolism and Disposition · doi:10.1124/dmd.119.086744 · Cited by 127
Davies, M., Jones, R. D. O., Grime, K., Jansson-Löfmark, R., Fretland, A. J., Winiwarter, S., Morgan, P., & McGinnity, D. F. (2020) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2020.03.004 · Cited by 123
Barlaam, B. C., Casella, R., Cidado, J. R., Cook, C., Savi, C. D., Dishington, A. P., Donald, C. S., Drew, L., Ferguson, A. D., Ferguson, D., et al. (2020) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c01754 · Cited by 121
Sun, D., Yu, L. X., Hussain, M. A., Wall, D. A., Smith, R. L., & Amidon, G. L. (2004) · PubMed · Cited by 119
Self-citationSun, D. (2020) · The AAPS Journal · doi:10.1208/s12248-020-00459-8 · Cited by 116
Self-citationLymphatic targeting by albumin-hitchhiking: Applications and optimisation
Abdallah, M., Müllertz, O. O., Styles, I. K., Mörsdorf, A., Quinn, J. F., Whittaker, M. R., & Trevaskis, N. L. (2020) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.07.046 · Cited by 115
Hargreaves, R., Ferreira, J. C. A., Hughes, D., Brands, J., Hale, J., Mattson, B., & Mills, S. (2011) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.05961.x · Cited by 102
Improving the efficacy-safety balance of polypharmacology in multi-target drug discovery
Ravikumar, B., & Aittokallio, T. A. (2017) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1080/17460441.2018.1413089 · Cited by 101
Hammarlund‐Udenaes, M. (2009) · Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology · doi:10.1111/j.1742-7843.2009.00517.x · Cited by 91
Adhikari, N., Amin, S. A., Trivedi, P., Jha, T., & Ghosh, B. (2018) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.08.081 · Cited by 77
Pharmaceutical Medicine and Translational Clinical Research
(2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2014-0-01796-0 · Cited by 75
Poulin, P., Burczynski, F. J., & Haddad, S. (2015) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.24571 · Cited by 74
Michelson, D., Hargreaves, R. J., Alexander, R., Ceesay, P., Hietala, J. A., Lines, C., & Reines, S. A. (2012) · The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1017/s1461145712000065 · Cited by 71
Luan, X., Yuan, H., Song, Y., Hu, H., Wen, B., He, M., Zhang, H., Li, Y., Li, F., Pan, S., et al. (2021) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120910 · Cited by 70
Self-citationBoger, E., Evans, N. D., Chappell, M. J., Lundqvist, A. J., Ewing, P., Wigenborg, A., & Fridén, M. (2016) · CPT Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology · doi:10.1002/psp4.12074 · Cited by 68
Impact of Recovery on Fraction Unbound Using Equilibrium Dialysis
Di, L., Umland, J. P., Trapa, P. E., & Maurer, T. S. (2011) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.23013 · Cited by 65
Positron emission tomographic imaging in drug discovery
Ghosh, K. K., Padmanabhan, P., Yang, C., Ng, D. C. E., Palanivel, M., Mishra, S., Halldin, C., & Gulyás, B. Z. (2021) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2021.07.025 · Cited by 63
Vleet, T. R. V., Liguori, M. J., Lynch, J. J., Rao, M. S., & Warder, S. E. (2018) · SLAS DISCOVERY · doi:10.1177/2472555218799713 · Cited by 61
McNulty, D. E., Bonnette, W. G., Qi, H., Wang, L., Ho, T. F., Waszkiewicz, A., Kallal, L. A., Nagarajan, R. P., Stern, M., Quinn, A. M., et al. (2017) · SLAS DISCOVERY · doi:10.1177/2472555217732014 · Cited by 53
Arrieta, O. G., Medina, L. A., Estrada-Lobato, E., Ramírez-Tirado, L.-A., Mendoza-García, V. O., & de la Garza-Salazar, J. (2014) · Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00280-014-2477-x · Cited by 51
Mutations of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Kim, A., Jang, M. H., Lee, S. J., & Bae, Y. K. (2017) · Journal of Breast Cancer · doi:10.4048/jbc.2017.20.2.150 · Cited by 48
Risks and benefits associated with novel phase 1 oncology trial designs
Koyfman, S. A., Agrawal, M., Garrett-Mayer, E. S., Krohmal, B. J., Wolf, E. R., Emanuel, E. J., & Gross, C. P. (2007) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.22878 · Cited by 46
New Approaches to Drug Discovery
Nielsch, U., Fuhrmann, U., & Jaroch, S. (2016) · Handbook of experimental pharmacology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28914-4 · Cited by 41
Hendrickx, R., Bergström, E. L., Janzén, D. L. I., Fridén, M., Eriksson, U. G., Grime, K., & Ferguson, D. (2017) · CPT Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology · doi:10.1002/psp4.12270 · Cited by 38
Poulin, P. (2015) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.24427 · Cited by 37
Nonlinear Protein Binding: Not What You Think
Deitchman, A. N., Singh, R. S. P., & Derendorf, H. (2018) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.xphs.2018.03.023 · Cited by 36
Virtual screening of chemical libraries for drug discovery
Green, D. V. S. (2008) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1517/17460441.3.9.1011 · Cited by 36
Underappreciated Chemical Interactions in Protein–Ligand Complexes
Anighoro, A. (2020) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-0282-9_5 · Cited by 35
Use of toxicogenomics in drug safety evaluation: Current status and an industry perspective
Vahle, J. L., Anderson, U., Blomme, E. A. G., Hoflack, J.-C., & Stiehl, D. P. (2018) · Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.04.011 · Cited by 33
In Vivo Imaging in Pharmaceutical Development and Its Impact on the 3Rs
Campbell, B. R., Trotter, D. E. G., Hines, C. D. G., Li, W., Patel, M. R., Zhang, W., & Evelhoch, J. L. (2016) · ILAR Journal · doi:10.1093/ilar/ilw019 · Cited by 32
Pharmacological property optimization for allosteric ligands: A medicinal chemistry perspective
Johnstone, S., & Albert, J. S. (2017) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2017.03.084 · Cited by 27
Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Drug Interactions
Saha, N. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-802103-3.00006-7 · Cited by 26
Optimization techniques for novel c-Met kinase inhibitors
Sun, Z., Yang, Y.-A., Zhang, Z., & Zhu, H. (2018) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1080/17460441.2019.1551355 · Cited by 24
Role of vandetanib in the management of medullary thyroid cancer
Brassard, M., & Rondeau (2012) · Biologics · doi:10.2147/btt.s24220 · Cited by 21
Methods to optimize CNS exposure of drug candidates
Patel, N. C. (2020) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2020.127503 · Cited by 21
Innovative approaches in CNS drug discovery
Charvériat, M., Lafon, V., Mouthon, F., & Zimmer, L. (2020) · Therapies · doi:10.1016/j.therap.2020.12.006 · Cited by 20
Applications of Multi-Target Computer-Aided Methodologies in Molecular Design of CNS Drugs
Raevsky, O. A., Mukhametov, A., Grigorev, V. Y., Ustyugov, A. A., Tsay, S., Hwu, J. R., Yarla, N. S., Tarasov, V. V., Aliev, G. M., & Бачурин, С. О. (2018) · Current Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/0929867324666170920154111 · Cited by 16
Li, Y., Ramírez‐Valle, F., Xue, Y., Ventura, J. I., Gouédard, O., Mei, J. M., Takeshita, K., Palmisano, M., & Zhou, S. Y. (2017) · The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1002/jcph.923 · Cited by 16
Self-citationCellular Target Engagement: A New Paradigm in Drug Discovery
Babić, I., Kesari, S., & Nurmemmedov, E. (2018) · Future Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.4155/fmc-2018-0139 · Cited by 9
The Science and Business of Drug Discovery: Demystifying the Jargon. By Edward D. Zanders.
Müller, K. (2012) · ChemMedChem · doi:10.1002/cmdc.201200067 · Cited by 1
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 106 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Kerns, 2008, Chapter 2—advantages of good drug-like properties, 6
- Kerns, 2008, Chapter 19 - pharmacokinetics, 228
- Wei Gao, 2022, Structure‒tissue exposure/selectivity relationship (STR) may correlate with clinical efficacy/safety, Acta Pharm Sin B
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Computational approaches streamlining drug discovery
Sadybekov, A., & Katritch, V. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05905-z · Cited by 1,424
Self-Driving Laboratories for Chemistry and Materials Science
Tom, G., Schmid, S. P., Baird, S. G., Cao, Y., Darvish, K., Hao, H., Lo, S., Pablo-García, S., Rajaonson, E. M., Skreta, M., et al. (2024) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00055 · Cited by 707
Drug repurposing for cancer therapy
Xia, Y., Sun, M., Huang, H., & Jin, W.-L. (2024) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-024-01808-1 · Cited by 443
“15 The strategies of drug repurposing involve exploring new therapeutic applications for drugs that have already been approved.”
BackgroundMarques, L., Costa, B., Pereira, M., Silva, A., Santos, J., Saldanha, L., da Silva, I. C. B., Magalhães, P., Schmidt, S., & Vale, N. (2024) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics16030332 · Cited by 444
Attention is all you need: utilizing attention in AI-enabled drug discovery
Zhang, Y., Liu, C., Liu, M., Liu, T., Lin, H., Cheng-bing, H., & Lin, N. (2023) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbad467 · Cited by 391
Metadata
- Authors
- Sun, D., Gao, W., Hu, H., & Zhou, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sun, Duxin
- Venue
- Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-07
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 3049-3062
- ISSN
- 2211-3835 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9293739
- OpenAlex
- W4211238337
- Cited by
- 1,763
- References
- 106
- Citations by year
- 2026: 482 · 2025: 550 · 2024: 456 · 2023: 230 · 2022: 45
- FWCI
- 27.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Keywords
- medication optimization, tissue selectivity, structure-activity relationship, target validation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review