Cited by 57Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesNutrition and Health in AgingFrailty in Older Adults

Sarcopenia and polypharmacy among older adults: A scoping review of the literature

Pana, Anastasia, Sourtzi, Panayota, Kalokairinou, Athina, Velonaki, Venetia Sofia·2022·Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics

Abstract

Background Sarcopenia and polypharmacy are both prevalent conditions in the geriatric population, leading to poor quality of life and adverse outcomes. Objective To explore the evidence on the relationship between sarcopenia and polypharmacy and to summarize the findings and the gaps from the existing literature. Method A systematic scoping review was conducted between March and May 2021, with no restriction on publication date, using the Arksey and O'Malley framework and reported according to PRISMA-ScR. Four bibliographic databases, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Proquest One Academic, and four sources of gray literature were searched for studies written in English or Greek. Data were extracted quantitatively and using thematic analysis. Results Of the 397 initially retrieved records, 22 studies were finally included in this review, 20 published articles and 2 posters-presentations. Most of the studies used cross-sectional data. The relationship between sarcopenia and polypharmacy should be interpreted on the basis of the definition of polypharmacy, the diagnostic criteria of sarcopenia used, and the population setting. Sarcopenia or risk for sarcopenia are associated with polypharmacy or the number of medications in community-dwelling older adults, regardless of diagnostic criteria used for sarcopenia. Conclusion There is an association between sarcopenia or risk for sarcopenia and polypharmacy or the number of medications in community-dwelling older adults but not among…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.archger.2021.104520

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 64 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pana, A., Sourtzi, P., Kalokairinou, A., & Velonaki, V. S.
Affiliations
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
Corresponding author
Pana, Anastasia
Venue
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
98
Pages
104520
ISSN
0167-4943 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3199744740
Cited by
57
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
Keywords
sarcopenia, polypharmacy, older adults, community-dwelling older adults, nursing home residents, medication burden, sarcopenia diagnostic criteria, sarcopenia assessment
MeSH terms
Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Quality of Life, Polypharmacy, Sarcopenia, Independent Living

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review