Cited by 452Nutrition and Health in AgingMuscle metabolism and nutritionMuscle Physiology and Disorders

Preserving Healthy Muscle during Weight Loss

Open access
Cava, Edda, Yeat, Nai Chien, Mittendorfer, Bettina·2017·Advances in Nutrition

Abstract

Weight loss is the cornerstone of therapy for people with obesity because it can ameliorate or completely resolve the metabolic risk factors for diabetes, coronary artery disease, and obesity-associated cancers. The potential health benefits of diet-induced weight loss are thought to be compromised by the weight-loss-associated loss of lean body mass, which could increase the risk of sarcopenia (low muscle mass and impaired muscle function). The objective of this review is to provide an overview of what is known about weight-loss-induced muscle loss and its implications for overall physical function (e.g., ability to lift items, walk, and climb stairs). The currently available data in the literature show the following: 1 ) compared with persons with normal weight, those with obesity have more muscle mass but poor muscle quality; 2 ) diet-induced weight loss reduces muscle mass without adversely affecting muscle strength; 3 ) weight loss improves global physical function, most likely because of reduced fat mass; 4 ) high protein intake helps preserve lean body and muscle mass during weight loss but does not improve muscle strength and could have adverse effects on metabolic function; 5 ) both endurance- and resistance-type exercise help preserve muscle mass during weight loss, and resistance-type exercise also improves muscle strength. We therefore conclude that weight-loss therapy, including a hypocaloric diet with adequate (but not excessive) protein intake and increased phy…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3945/an.116.014506

Cites

144 of 144 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

66 of 115 cited sources checked · 17 supported · 2 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Interpretationcitation

    Resistance-type exercise helps preserve muscle mass during weight loss.

    “both endurance-and resistance-type exercise help preserve muscle mass during weight loss”
    • Also stated in: § Summary and Conclusions · plain
      “adding exercise (endurance and resistance type) to a hypocaloric diet helps preserve muscle mass during weight loss”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [55] Villareal, 2011, Weight loss, exercise, or both and physical function in obese older adults, N Engl J Med source
    • cites [65] Frimel, 2008, Exercise attenuates the weight-loss-induced reduction in muscle mass in frail obese older adults, Med Sci Sports Exerc source
    • cites [66] Figueroa, 2013, Effects of hypocaloric diet, low-intensity resistance exercise with slow movement, or both on aortic hemodynamics and muscle mass in obese postmenopausal women, Menopause source
    • cites [93] Nicklas, 2015, Effects of resistance training with and without caloric restriction on physical function and mobility in overweight and obese older adults: a randomized controlled trial, Am J Clin Nutr source

      The Results report that thigh muscle volume did not change in older overweight and obese adults who combined resistance training with caloric restriction. But they also report a significant loss of total lean mass, and the trial had no weight-loss-only group to show how much muscle resistance training preserved compared with weight loss without exercise. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Interpretationnone given

    High protein intake could have adverse effects on metabolic function.

    “and could have adverse effects on metabolic function”
    • Also stated in: § Summary and Conclusions · hedged
      “and could have adverse effects on metabolic function”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim5 of 8 sources checked
    • cites [106] Smith, 2016, High protein intake during weight loss therapy eliminates the weight loss-induced improvement in insulin action in postmenopausal women, Cell Reports source
    • cites [120] Linn, 2000, Effect of long-term dietary protein intake on glucose metabolism in humans, Diabetologia source
    • cites [121] Linn, 1996, Effect of dietary protein intake on insulin secretion and glucose metabolism in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, J Clin Endocrinol Metab

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [122] Wang, 2010, Higher protein intake is associated with diabetes risk in South Asian Indians: the Metabolic Syndrome and Atherosclerosis in South Asians Living in America (MASALA) Study, J Am Coll Nutr source
    • cites [123] Tinker, 2011, Biomarker-calibrated dietary energy and protein intake associations with diabetes risk among postmenopausal women from the Women's Health Initiative, Am J Clin Nutr source
    • cites [124] Sluijs, 2010, Dietary intake of total, animal, and vegetable protein and risk of type 2 diabetes in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-NL study, Diabetes Care source
    • cites [125] Levine, 2014, Low protein intake is associated with a major reduction in IGF-1, cancer, and overall mortality in the 65 and younger but not older population, Cell Metab source

      The Results (Association between Protein and Mortality; page not provided) associate higher protein intake with increased diabetes-related mortality, which supports concern about a possible adverse metabolic effect. The paper does not show that high protein intake impairs metabolic function itself, and its Discussion notes that the effects of protein intake differ by age. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [126] Similä, 2012, Carbohydrate substitution for fat or protein and risk of type 2 diabetes in male smokers, Eur J Clin Nutr source
  • Interpretationcitation

    Endurance-type exercise helps preserve muscle mass during weight loss.

    “both endurance-and resistance-type exercise help preserve muscle mass during weight loss”
    • Also stated in: § Summary and Conclusions · plain
      “adding exercise (endurance and resistance type) to a hypocaloric diet helps preserve muscle mass during weight loss”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 4 sources checked
    • cites (53,59,(62)(63)(64)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [63] Yoshimura, 2014, Aerobic exercise attenuates the loss of skeletal muscle during energy restriction in adults with visceral adiposity, Obes Facts source
    • cites [53] Weiss, 2007, Lower extremity muscle size and strength and aerobic capacity decrease with caloric restriction but not with exercise-induced weight loss, J Appl Physiol source
    • cites [59] Ross, 2000, Reduction in obesity and related comorbid conditions after diet-induced weight loss or exercise-induced weight loss in men: a randomized, controlled trial, Ann Intern Med source
  • Interpretationcitation

    High protein intake does not improve muscle strength during weight loss.

    “but does not improve muscle strength”
    • Also stated in: § Summary and Conclusions · plain
      “but does not improve muscle strength”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [54] Verreijen, 2015, A high whey protein-, leucine-, and vitamin D–enriched supplement preserves muscle mass during intentional weight loss in obese older adults: a double-blind randomized controlled trial, Am J Clin Nutr source

      The Results section (‘Muscle mass, muscle strength, and muscle function’; page not provided) reports that strength improved over 13 weeks in both groups, with no difference between them. This supports no additional strength benefit from the whey protein–, leucine–, and vitamin D–enriched supplement in obese older adults undergoing diet and resistance exercise, but not the broader claim that high protein intake does not improve strength during weight loss. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [56] Backx, 2016, Protein intake and lean body mass preservation during energy intake restriction in overweight older adults, Int J Obes (Lond) source
    • cites [98] Schollenberger, 2016, Impact of protein supplementation after bariatric surgery: a randomized controlled double-blind pilot study, Nutrition source
    • cites [107] Longland, 2016, Higher compared with lower dietary protein during an energy deficit combined with intense exercise promotes greater lean mass gain and fat mass loss: a randomized trial, Am J Clin Nutr source
  • Interpretationcitation

    High protein intake helps preserve lean body and muscle mass during weight loss.

    “high protein intake helps preserve lean body and muscle mass during weight loss”
    • Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
      “high protein intake helps preserve lean body and muscle mass”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [109] Kim, 2016, Effects of dietary protein intake on body composition changes after weight loss in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Nutr Rev source

      The Conclusion (p. 13) says adults aged 50 and older better retain lean mass on energy-restricted higher-protein diets than on normal-protein diets. The section on lean mass versus skeletal muscle mass (pp. 9, 12) cautions against equating the two: only one included study directly measured skeletal muscle mass. Thus, the lean-mass claim is supported, but preservation of muscle mass specifically is not established by this review. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [54] Verreijen, 2015, A high whey protein-, leucine-, and vitamin D–enriched supplement preserves muscle mass during intentional weight loss in obese older adults: a double-blind randomized controlled trial, Am J Clin Nutr source
  • May combine two claims. 16
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Diet-induced weight loss reduces muscle mass without adversely affecting muscle strength.

    “diet-induced weight loss reduces muscle mass without adversely affecting muscle strength”
    • Also stated in: § Summary and Conclusions · hedged
      “weight loss reduces muscle mass without adversely affecting muscle strength and improves global physical function, most likely because of reduced fat mass”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim8 of 10 sources checked
    • cites [47] Bosy-Westphal, 2009, Contribution of individual organ mass loss to weight loss–associated decline in resting energy expenditure, Am J Clin Nutr source

      The Body composition section reports a mean loss of 923 g of skeletal muscle mass after the low-calorie weight-loss intervention. The paper does not report a muscle-strength outcome, so it does not support the claim that strength was unaffected. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [52] Santanasto, 2011, Impact of weight loss on physical function with changes in strength, muscle mass, and muscle fat infiltration in overweight to moderately obese older adults: a randomized clinical trial, J Obes source

      Results §§3.4–3.5 report reduced thigh muscle area in the physical-activity-plus-weight-loss group, but also a 12.4% decline in knee extensor strength from baseline to six months (P = .01). The Discussion likewise says the group lost a significant amount of strength. The difference in strength change between intervention groups was not statistically significant (P = .11), but the paper does not support the claim that strength was unaffected. (LLM, conf=0.89)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [53] Weiss, 2007, Lower extremity muscle size and strength and aerobic capacity decrease with caloric restriction but not with exercise-induced weight loss, J Appl Physiol source

      The Discussion states that caloric restriction reduced both muscle size and strength, contrary to the claim that strength was unaffected. It qualifies that the strength decrease was proportional to weight loss, but does not say strength was preserved. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [54] Verreijen, 2015, A high whey protein-, leucine-, and vitamin D–enriched supplement preserves muscle mass during intentional weight loss in obese older adults: a double-blind randomized controlled trial, Am J Clin Nutr source

      In “Muscle mass, muscle strength, and muscle function” (page not provided), the control group had a numerical decline in appendicular muscle mass, while muscle strength improved in both groups. The decline in muscle mass was not statistically significant within the control group, and all participants also performed resistance training. The findings therefore do not establish that diet-induced weight loss alone reduces muscle mass without adversely affecting strength. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [55] Villareal, 2011, Weight loss, exercise, or both and physical function in obese older adults, N Engl J Med source
    • cites [56] Backx, 2016, Protein intake and lean body mass preservation during energy intake restriction in overweight older adults, Int J Obes (Lond) source
    • cites [59] Ross, 2000, Reduction in obesity and related comorbid conditions after diet-induced weight loss or exercise-induced weight loss in men: a randomized, controlled trial, Ann Intern Med source
    • cites [62] Ryan, 2014, Effects of weight loss and exercise on trunk muscle composition in older women, Clin Interv Aging source

      The Results (page not available in our copy) report an 8% decrease in erector spinae muscle area after weight-loss interventions, but no significant area change in three other trunk muscles; this only partly supports a general claim about reduced muscle mass. The paper does not report whether muscle strength was preserved, so that part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [63] Yoshimura, 2014, Aerobic exercise attenuates the loss of skeletal muscle during energy restriction in adults with visceral adiposity, Obes Facts source

      The Results report that thigh muscle area decreased in the diet-only group, supporting the muscle-mass part of the claim. The Methods describe measurements of muscle area and body composition, but the paper does not report a muscle-strength outcome; it therefore cannot establish that strength was unaffected. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [64] Chomentowski, 2009, Moderate exercise attenuates the loss of skeletal muscle mass that occurs with intentional caloric restriction-induced weight loss in older, overweight to obese adults, J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci source

      The Discussion reports that diet-induced weight loss significantly reduced muscle mass in older overweight to obese adults. It also states that the study did not include a muscular strength or power test, so it cannot support the claim that muscle strength was unaffected. (LLM, conf=0.91)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The potential health benefits of diet-induced weight loss could be compromised by weight-loss-associated loss of lean body (including muscle) mass, which could increase the risk of sarcopenia, especially in vulnerable populations such as postmenopausal women and older adults.

    “The potential health benefits of diet-induced weight loss are thought to be compromised by the weight-loss-associated loss of lean body mass, which could increase the risk of sarcopenia (low muscle mass and impaired muscle function).”
    • Also stated in: § Introduction · hedged
      “The potential health benefits of diet-induced weight loss could be compromised by the weight-loss-associated loss of lean body (including muscle) mass (9,10), which could increase the risk of sarcopenia (defined as low muscle mass and impaired muscle function) (10)(11)(12), especially in vulnerable populations, such as postmenopausal women and older adults (10,(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [9] Gill, 2015, Weight management in older adults, Curr Obes Rep source
    • cites [10] Miller, 2008, The danger of weight loss in the elderly, J Nutr Health Aging source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites (10)(11)(12)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites (10,(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Weight loss improves global physical function, most likely because of reduced fat mass.

    “weight loss improves global physical function, most likely because of reduced fat mass”
    • Also stated in: § Abstract · hedged
      “improves global physical function, most likely because of reduced fat mass”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim6 of 8 sources checked
    • cites [52] Santanasto, 2011, Impact of weight loss on physical function with changes in strength, muscle mass, and muscle fat infiltration in overweight to moderately obese older adults: a randomized clinical trial, J Obes source

      The Abstract and Discussion report improved physical function in the physical-activity-plus-weight-loss group and suggest that fat loss explains the improvement. However, Results §3.6 found no significant difference in SPPB improvement between groups, and the Discussion notes that the study cannot distinguish weight loss alone from the activity intervention. The unqualified claim overstates what this trial establishes. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [54] Verreijen, 2015, A high whey protein-, leucine-, and vitamin D–enriched supplement preserves muscle mass during intentional weight loss in obese older adults: a double-blind randomized controlled trial, Am J Clin Nutr source

      The Results report that fat mass decreased and muscle function improved during the 13-week intervention; the Discussion says physical-performance measures improved in both groups. The paper does not establish that reduced fat mass was the likely reason, and it discusses both training and weight loss as possible contributors. It also reports specific performance measures rather than a measure of global physical function. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [55] Villareal, 2011, Weight loss, exercise, or both and physical function in obese older adults, N Engl J Med source

      The Discussion reports that weight loss improved physical function in obese older adults and suggests that changes in body composition could underlie the improvement. The claim omits that population restriction and presents reduced fat mass as a more likely explanation than the paper establishes. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [56] Backx, 2016, Protein intake and lean body mass preservation during energy intake restriction in overweight older adults, Int J Obes (Lond) source
    • cites [93] Nicklas, 2015, Effects of resistance training with and without caloric restriction on physical function and mobility in overweight and obese older adults: a randomized controlled trial, Am J Clin Nutr source

      The Results (page not specified) report improved physical-function measures in overweight and obese older adults receiving resistance training with caloric restriction, and associate greater fat loss with better 400-m walk time. The Discussion says fat-mass loss is a stronger predictor of functional improvement than lean-mass loss. The trial does not establish that reduced fat mass caused an improvement in global physical function: several measures improved similarly with resistance training alone, and the fat-loss analysis was correlational. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [115] Porter Starr, 2016, Improved function with enhanced protein intake per meal: a pilot study of weight reduction in frail, obese older adults, J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci source

      The Abstract Results (page unavailable) report that both weight-loss groups improved physical function, and Results > Secondary Outcomes (page unavailable) report reduced fat mass in both groups. The paper does not establish that fat loss was the most likely cause of the functional improvement; the protein group improved more despite no between-group difference in fat-mass change. The findings also concern obese, functionally limited older adults, rather than weight loss generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [127] Steele, 2015, Impact of bariatric surgery on physical functioning in obese adults, Obes Rev source
    • cites [128] Beavers, 2013, Fat mass loss predicts gain in physical function with intentional weight loss in older adults, J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci source

      The Discussion reports that fat mass loss predicts improvements in gait speed and mobility during intentional weight loss in older adults. The claim broadens those measured outcomes to global physical function and suggests a causal explanation, whereas the Discussion says the causal mechanisms have not been fully established. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Weight loss is the cornerstone of therapy for people with obesity because it can ameliorate or completely resolve the metabolic risk factors for diabetes, coronary artery disease, and obesity-associated cancers.

    “Weight loss is the cornerstone of therapy for people with obesity because it can ameliorate or completely resolve the metabolic risk factors for diabetes, coronary artery disease, and obesity-associated cancers.”
    • Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
      “Obesity is associated with cardiometabolic diseases (e.g., diabetes and coronary artery disease) (1-3) and certain types of cancer (e.g., colon) (4-6), and diet-induced weight loss can ameliorate or completely resolve the metabolic risk factors (e.g., insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, increased blood pressure) for these conditions (1)(2)(3)(5)(6)(7)(8).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 7 sources checked
    • cites [1] Klein, 2002, AGA technical review on obesity, Gastroenterology source
    • cites [2] Kirk, 2009, Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of the cardiometabolic syndrome, J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) source

      The Abstract and Summary describe obesity-related metabolic abnormalities and cardiovascular risk, but neither addresses weight loss as therapy. Searches for weight-loss treatment, resolution of risk factors, and obesity-associated cancers found no passage in our copy supporting the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.75)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [3] Klein, 2004, Circulation source
    • cites [4] Moghaddam, 2007, Obesity and risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of 31 studies with 70,000 events, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev source
    • cites [5] Gallagher, 2015, Obesity and diabetes: the increased risk of cancer and cancer-related mortality, Physiol Rev source
    • cites [6] Wolin, 2010, Obesity and cancer, Oncologist source

      The 'Weight Loss and Intermediate Endpoints' section reports improvements in insulin, glucose, and blood pressure with weight loss and increased activity; 'Counseling for Weight Loss' describes diabetes prevention, and 'Weight Loss and Cancer Risk Reduction' describes reduced cancer risk. The paper does not establish that weight loss completely resolves these risk factors, specifically addresses coronary artery disease, or calls weight loss the cornerstone of obesity therapy. Page numbers were not available for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites (1)(2)(3)(5)(6)(7)(8)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Diet-induced weight loss reduces muscle lipid content and does not affect or slightly decreases leg muscle strength.

    “Diet-induced weight loss reduces muscle lipid content (assessed by X-ray attenuation or MRI) (52,62,63,74) and does not affect (55,65,93), or slightly decreases (48,52,56), leg muscle strength.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim6 of 9 sources checked
    • cites [52] Santanasto, 2011, Impact of weight loss on physical function with changes in strength, muscle mass, and muscle fat infiltration in overweight to moderately obese older adults: a randomized clinical trial, J Obes source

      The Results (§3.4) report reduced muscle lipid content, measured by CT muscle attenuation, in the physical-activity-plus-weight-loss group. The Results (§3.5) also report a significant 12.4% decline in knee extensor strength over six months, which is not clearly a slight decrease. Because the intervention combined diet-induced weight loss with physical activity, the study does not isolate the effect of diet alone. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [62] Ryan, 2014, Effects of weight loss and exercise on trunk muscle composition in older women, Clin Interv Aging source

      The Results (Response to AEX+WL and WL; page unavailable) report reduced CT-measured intramuscular fat after diet-induced weight loss, although the reduction with weight loss alone was statistically significant only in the lateral abdominal muscle. The paper studies trunk muscles and does not report whether leg muscle strength was unchanged or slightly decreased after weight loss. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [63] Yoshimura, 2014, Aerobic exercise attenuates the loss of skeletal muscle during energy restriction in adults with visceral adiposity, Obes Facts source

      The Methods (Computed Tomography; page unavailable) identify low-density muscle area as a marker of lipid-rich skeletal muscle, and the Results report that it decreased in the diet-only group. This supports a reduction in lipid-rich muscle area, but not a direct measurement of muscle lipid content. The paper does not report whether diet-induced weight loss affected leg muscle strength. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [74] Teichtahl, 2016, Associations of surgical and nonsurgical weight loss with knee musculature: a cohort study of obese adults, Surg Obes Relat Dis source
    • cites [55] Villareal, 2011, Weight loss, exercise, or both and physical function in obese older adults, N Engl J Med source

      The Results (Body Weight and Composition; page unavailable) report reduced fat mass and similar changes in thigh fat after diet-induced weight loss, but do not establish a reduction in muscle lipid content. The Results (Strength, Balance, Gait, and Quality of Life; page unavailable) say total strength was maintained in the diet group; that measure included leg exercises but does not establish the claim specifically for leg muscle strength. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [65] Frimel, 2008, Exercise attenuates the weight-loss-induced reduction in muscle mass in frail obese older adults, Med Sci Sports Exerc source
    • cites [93] Nicklas, 2015, Effects of resistance training with and without caloric restriction on physical function and mobility in overweight and obese older adults: a randomized controlled trial, Am J Clin Nutr source

      The results report that thigh intermuscular adipose tissue decreased in the resistance-training-plus-caloric-restriction group, but it also decreased in the resistance-training-only group; the study therefore does not establish that diet-induced weight loss caused the reduction. Knee extensor strength increased in both groups, with no significant difference between them. Thus, the paper supports no additional effect of caloric restriction on leg strength during resistance training, not that leg strength was unchanged overall. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [48] Johnson, 1994, Loss of muscle mass is poorly reflected in grip strength performance in healthy young men, Med Sci Sports Exerc source
    • cites [56] Backx, 2016, Protein intake and lean body mass preservation during energy intake restriction in overweight older adults, Int J Obes (Lond) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Grip strength and global measures of physical function, such as balance, walking speed, or climbing stairs, improve after weight loss.

    “Grip strength and global measures of physical function, such as balance, walking speed, or climbing stairs, improve after weight loss (52, 54-56, 93, 115, 127).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim5 of 7 sources checked
    • cites [52] Santanasto, 2011, Impact of weight loss on physical function with changes in strength, muscle mass, and muscle fat infiltration in overweight to moderately obese older adults: a randomized clinical trial, J Obes source

      Results §3.6 (page unavailable) reports improved overall physical function in the physical-activity-plus-weight-loss group, measured by a battery that includes walking and balance; it found no significant difference in improvement between intervention groups. The paper does not report improved grip strength or stair-climbing performance, and its intervention combined weight loss with physical activity rather than testing weight loss alone. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [54] Verreijen, 2015, A high whey protein-, leucine-, and vitamin D–enriched supplement preserves muscle mass during intentional weight loss in obese older adults: a double-blind randomized controlled trial, Am J Clin Nutr source

      The Results section (page not specified) says muscle strength and function improved over the 13-week weight-loss intervention, and Table 4 reports increased handgrip strength. The Methods section lists walking tests, but not balance or stair-climbing tests, so this paper does not support those specific examples. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [55] Villareal, 2011, Weight loss, exercise, or both and physical function in obese older adults, N Engl J Med source

      The Results (page unavailable) report improved Physical Performance Test scores after diet-induced weight loss; the test includes walking, balance, and stair-climbing tasks. They also report improved balance in the diet group. However, the paper does not report grip strength, and its measured strength was maintained—not improved—in the diet-only group; gait-speed improvement was reported for the diet–exercise group, not the diet-only group. (LLM, conf=0.89)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [56] Backx, 2016, Protein intake and lean body mass preservation during energy intake restriction in overweight older adults, Int J Obes (Lond) source
    • cites [93] Nicklas, 2015, Effects of resistance training with and without caloric restriction on physical function and mobility in overweight and obese older adults: a randomized controlled trial, Am J Clin Nutr source

      The Treatment effects results (page not provided) report improved grip strength, walking time, gait speed, and overall physical-performance score in older adults receiving resistance training plus caloric restriction. The Discussion (page not provided) says most functional gains were attributable to resistance training rather than weight loss; balance was not reported separately as improved, and stair climbing was not measured. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [115] Porter Starr, 2016, Improved function with enhanced protein intake per meal: a pilot study of weight reduction in frail, obese older adults, J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci source

      The Results > Primary Outcomes section reports improved overall physical function scores in both weight-loss groups. But Results > Secondary Outcomes explicitly says handgrip strength remained unchanged, and the study measured chair stands rather than stair climbing. Thus the source supports improved global function, not the full claim. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [127] Steele, 2015, Impact of bariatric surgery on physical functioning in obese adults, Obes Rev source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Fish-oil-derived n-3 FA supplementation improves muscle mass, strength, and physical function in weight-stable older adults, and beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate improves both muscle mass and strength in healthy young and older adults.

    “Fish-oil-derived n-3 FA supplementation has been shown to improve muscle mass, strength, and physical function in weight-stable older adults (130, 131); and b-hydroxy-b-methylbutyrate, a metabolite of leucine, improved both muscle mass and strength in healthy young and older adults (132, 133).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [130] Rodacki, 2012, Fish-oil supplementation enhances the effects of strength training in elderly women, Am J Clin Nutr source
    • cites [131] Smith, 2015, Fish oil–derived n–3 polyunsaturated fatty acid therapy increases muscle mass and strength in older adults: a randomized controlled trial, Am J Clin Nutr source

      The Results section reports increased thigh muscle volume and handgrip and one-repetition-maximum strength after six months of fish-oil n-3 PUFA therapy, without a significant change in body weight. The study assessed muscle strength and power, but did not directly demonstrate improved physical function; its increase in muscle power was a nonsignificant trend. The beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate claim is attached to different citations, not this paper. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [132] Nissen, 2003, Effect of dietary supplements on lean mass and strength gains with resistance exercise: a meta-analysis, J Appl Physiol source
    • cites [133] Wu, 2015, Effect of beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate supplementation on muscle loss in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Arch Gerontol Geriatr source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Compared with persons with normal weight, those with obesity have more muscle mass but poor muscle quality.

    “compared with persons with normal weight, those with obesity have more muscle mass but poor muscle quality”
    • Also stated in: § Summary and Conclusions · plain
      “persons with obesity have more muscle mass than those with normal weight but poor muscle quality”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites (26)(27)(28)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites (27)(28)(29)(30)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Obesity is associated with poor muscle quality, which adversely affects muscle function.

    “obesity is associated with poor muscle quality, which adversely affects muscle function”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites (27)(28)(29)(30)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Resistance-type exercise is an effective strategy to attenuate or even prevent the weight-loss-induced loss of muscle mass during weight loss, whereas the effects of endurance-type exercise on muscle mass during weight loss are uncertain.

    “Together, these results suggest that resistance-type exercise is an effective strategy to attenuate or even prevent the weight-loss-induced loss of muscle mass during weight loss, whereas the effects of endurance-type exercise on muscle mass during weight loss are uncertain.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In persons who are overweight or obese, fat-free mass contributes only about 20-30% to total weight loss, and weight regain does not prevent fat-free mass regain.

    “In persons who are overweight or obese, fat-free mass contributes only ;20-30% to total weight loss (48,(50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(55)(56)(57)(58)(59), and weight regain does not prevent fat-free mass regain (49).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites (48,(50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(55)(56)(57)(58)(59)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [49] Bosy-Westphal, 2014, Measuring the impact of weight cycling on body composition: a methodological challenge, Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Both weight loss and weight gain are accompanied by corresponding changes in both body fat and fat-free (including muscle) mass.

    “Moreover, both weight loss and weight gain are accompanied by corresponding changes in both body fat and fat-free (including muscle) mass (22)(23)(24)(25).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites (22)(23)(24)(25)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Diet-induced weight loss in those with obesity results in a more favorable fat-free mass to fat mass ratio despite loss of lean mass, and weight cycling has no adverse effect on body composition in persons with obesity.

    “Diet-induced weight loss in those with obesity therefore results in a more favorable fat-free mass to fat mass ratio despite loss of lean mass, and weight cycling (yo-yo effect) has no adverse effect on body composition in persons with obesity (49).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [49] Bosy-Westphal, 2014, Measuring the impact of weight cycling on body composition: a methodological challenge, Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Short-term calorie restriction decreases the postprandial rate of muscle protein synthesis and decreases or does not change the basal rate of muscle protein synthesis in overweight and obese young and middle-aged men and women.

    “Studies that evaluated the effect of short-term (14-21 d) calorie restriction (;30-40% energy deficit/d) on the rate of muscle protein synthesis in young and middle-aged men and women who were overweight and obese found that calorie restriction decreases the postprandial rate of muscle protein synthesis and decreases or does not change the basal rate of muscle protein synthesis (75)(76)(77).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites (75)(76)(77)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Weight loss, despite causing loss of muscle mass, has beneficial effects on muscle quality and improves overall physical function.

    “Together, these results suggest that weight loss, despite causing loss of muscle mass, has beneficial effects on muscle quality and improves overall physical function.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A recent meta-analysis found a small but significant positive effect of dietary vitamin D supplementation on muscle strength, especially in older people with vitamin D insufficiency, but no effect on muscle mass.

    “A recent meta-analysis of studies conducted between 1996 and 2014 found a small but significant positive effect of dietary vitamin D supplementation on muscle strength, especially in older people with vitamin D insufficiency, but no effect on muscle mass (129).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [129] Beaudart, 2014, The effects of vitamin D on skeletal muscle strength, muscle mass, and muscle power: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, J Clin Endocrinol Metab source
16 of 16

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 146 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cava, E., Yeat, N. C., & Mittendorfer, B.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Mittendorfer, Bettina
Venue
Advances in Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-05
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
511-519
ISSN
  • 2156-5376 (ISSN-L)
  • 2161-8313
OpenAlex
W2615166425
Cited by
452
References
146
Citations by year
2026: 90 · 2025: 87 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advances in Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Rural Development Administration
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000448, DK56341, TR000448, UL1TR002345)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK094483, P30DK056341)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
Keywords
weight loss, obesity, sarcopenia, lean body mass, muscle mass, muscle strength, physical function, protein intake, resistance training, endurance exercise, hypocaloric diet, fat mass, muscle quality
MeSH terms
Body Composition, Diet, Reducing, Dietary Proteins, Humans, Obesity, Weight Loss, Exercise, Body Mass Index, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Strength, Sarcopenia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review