Cited by 196Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementClinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyNutrition and Health in Aging

Nutritional intervention in malnourished hospitalized patients with heart failure

Bonilla-Palomas, Juan L., Gámez-López, Antonio L., Castillo-Domínguez, Juan C., Moreno-Conde, Mirian, López Ibáñez, María C., Alhambra Expósito, Rosa, Ramiro Ortega, Esmeralda, Anguita-Sánchez, Manuel P. +1 more·2016·Archives of Medical Research

Abstract

Background and aims Hospitalized patients with heart failure who are malnourished present a worse prognosis than those with an adequate nutritional status. We undertook this study to assess whether a nutritional intervention in malnourished hospitalized patients with heart failure benefits morbidity and mortality. Methods A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted. A total of 120 malnourished hospitalized patients due to acute heart failure were randomised to conventional heart failure treatment or conventional heart failure treatment combined with an individualized nutritional intervention. The primary endpoint of this study was a composite of all-cause death or readmission for worsening of HF, with a maximum follow-up of 12 months. Analysis was by intention to treat. Results Recruitment was stopped early according to the study protocol after completing the follow-up of the first 120 patients enrolled (59 in the intervention group and 61 in the control group). Both groups were homogeneous in baseline characteristics. At 12 months, the primary outcome occurred in 27.1% of patients in the intervention group and in 60.7% of patients in the control group (hazard ratio 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-0.62, p = 0.0004). In total, 20.3% of patients died in the intervention group and 47.5% in the control group (hazard ratio 0.37, 95% CI, 0.19-0.72, p = 0.003). Readmission due to heart failure was also lower in the intervention group (10.2 vs. 36.1%, p = 0.001). Conclusion Nutritional intervention in malnourished hospitalized patients with heart failure reduces the risk of death from any cause and the risk of readmission for worsening of heart failure (ClinicalTrial.govNCT01472237).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.arcmed.2016.11.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a clinical trial of inpatients with heart failure and malnutrition, an individualized nutritional approach improved mortality and readmissions.

    “In a clinical trial of inpatients with HF (12.5% receiving inotropes) and malnutrition,132 an individualized nutritional approach improved mortality and readmissions.”
  • In the PICNIC study, individualized registered dietitian nutritionist-led dietary counseling and support reduced the composite of hospital readmissions and mortality, reduced mortality as a secondary end point, and improved quality of life in patients with heart failure and risk of malnutrition.

    “Individualized RDN-led dietary counseling and support reduced the composite of hospital readmissions and mortality, as well as mortality as a secondary end point, and improved quality of life.132”
  • In the PICNIC study, both mortality (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.19-0.72, p=0.003) and readmission rates were lower in the intervention group (10.2 vs 36.1%, p=0.001).

    “Both mortality (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.19e0.72,p ¼ 0.003) and readmission rates were lower in the IG patients (10.2 vs. 36.1%,p ¼ 0.001)”
  • In the PICNIC study, at twelve months the primary composite endpoint (all-cause mortality and readmission due to deterioration of heart failure) occurred in 27.1% of the intervention group compared to 60.7% of control patients (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.19-0.62, p=0.0004).

    “At twelve months, the primary composite endpoint (all-cause mortality and readmission due to deterioration of heart failure) occurred in 27.1% of the IG compared to 60.7% of CG patients (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.19e0.62,p ¼ 0.0004).”
  • Readmission rates were significantly reduced after six months of nutritional intervention in several trials but not all.

    “it was significantly reduced after six months of nutritional intervention in several trials (level of evidence: 1-) [116] (level of evidence: 1þ) [130] (level of evidence: 1þþ) [126] but not all (level of evidence: 1þ) [125].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bonilla-Palomas, J. L., Gámez-López, A. L., Castillo-Domínguez, J. C., Moreno-Conde, M., López Ibáñez, M. C., Alhambra Expósito, R., Ramiro Ortega, E., Anguita-Sánchez, M. P., & Villar-Ráez, A.
Affiliations
  • Hospital San Juan de la Cruz (ES)
  • Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía (ES)
Venue
Archives of Medical Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-10
Volume
47
Issue
7
Pages
535-540
ISSN
  • 0066-6769 (ISSN-L)
  • 0188-4409
OpenAlex
W2593271198
Cited by
196
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 3
FWCI
10.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Medical Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Sociedad Española de Cardiología
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
Keywords
heart failure, malnutrition, dietary intervention, hospitalized patients, all-cause mortality, heart failure readmission, personalized nutrition, acute heart failure
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Inpatients, Male, Mortality, Nutritional Status, Patient Readmission, Risk, Malnutrition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review