Cited by 83Tactile and Sensory InteractionsIon Channels and ReceptorsPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Effect of ageing on tactile transduction processes

Decorps, Johanna, Saumet, Jean Louis, Sommer, Pascal, Sigaudo-Roussel, Dominique, Fromy, Berengere·2014·Ageing Research Reviews

Abstract

With advancing age, a decline in the main sensory modalities including touch sensation and perception is well reported to occur. This review mainly outlines the peripheral components of touch perception highlighting ageing influences on morphological and functional features of cutaneous mechanical transducers and mechanosensitive ion channels, sensory innervation, neurotransmitters and even vascular system required to ensure efferent function of the afferent nerve fibres in the skin. This, in conjunction with effect of ageing on the skin per se and central nervous system, could explain the tactile deficit seen among the ageing population. We also discuss appropriate tools and experimental models available to study the age-related tactile decline.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.arr.2013.12.003

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The decrease in the number of fibers due to aging is more pronounced in some body regions than others, and the skin of the face, arms, legs, hands, and feet is most affected, while the number of fibers innervating the abdomen remains almost unchanged.

    “There is evidence that the decrease in the number of fibers due to aging is more pronounced in some body regions than others, and that the skin of the face, arms, legs, hands, and feet is most affected, while the number of fibers innervating the abdomen remains almost unchanged (Decorps et al. 2014).”

    From Tactile innervation densities across the whole body (2020) · cites this paper as Decorps et al. 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Decorps, J., Saumet, J. L., Sommer, P., Sigaudo-Roussel, D., & Fromy, B.
Affiliations
Lyon 1 Université (FR)
Venue
Ageing Research Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-01
Volume
13
Pages
90-99
ISSN
1568-1637 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077895932
Cited by
83
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5
FWCI
0.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ageing Research Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
aging, tactile perception, mechanosensitive ion channels, cutaneous mechanoreceptors, sensory innervation, neurotransmitters, afferent nerve fibers, skin aging
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aging, Animals, Humans, Microcirculation, Physical Stimulation, Pressure, Sensory Receptor Cells, Regional Blood Flow, Skin, Touch, Models, Animal, Mechanotransduction, Cellular, Mice, Rats, Touch Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review