The DOI matches its Crossref record; 172 of the 176 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enactive artificial intelligence: Investigating the systemic organization of life and mind
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Building on Don Ihde's phenomenology of technics [38] and enactive AI research [23,63], I will argue that AI functions as an extension relation: a structure that co-constitutes human cognition and action rather than standing merely as an instrument or alterity.”
From 4E cognition and the coevolution of human–AI interaction (2025) · cites this paper as [23]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hepburn, R. W., Heidegger, M., Macquarrie, J., & Robinson, E. (1927) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 12,201
Nagel, T. (1974) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2183914 · Cited by 7,440
Searle, J. R. (1980) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00005756 · Cited by 6,954
The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience
Varela, F. J., Rosch, E. H., & Thompson, E. T. (2017) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · Cited by 5,910
Intelligence without representation
Brooks, R. A. (1991) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(91)90053-m · Cited by 4,853
Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living
Maturana, H. R., Varela, F. J., & Beer, S. (1980) · Cited by 4,667
(1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,269
Harnad, S. (1990) · Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena · doi:10.1016/0167-2789(90)90087-6 · Cited by 4,235 · cited 1×
“[84,33]), Harnard’s [59] formulation of the “symbol grounding problem”, or even the extensive Heideggerian criticisms developed by Dreyfus [42,43,45].”
BackgroundThe conscious mind: in search of a fundamental theory
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-2091 · Cited by 4,150
Some Philosophical Problems from the Standpoint of Artificial Intelligence
McCarthy, J., & Hayes, P. J. (1981) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-934613-03-3.50033-7 · Cited by 3,296
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Harvey, 1996, Untimed and misrepresented: Connectionism and the computer metaphor, Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behavior Quarterly, 96, 20
- Langton, 1989, Artificial life, vol. 4, 1
- J. Stewart, E.A. Di Paolo, O. Gapenne, Introduction, in: J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, E.A. Di Paolo (Eds.), Enaction: Towards a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, in press
- T. Ziemke, Are robots embodied?, in: C. Balkenius, et al. (Eds.), Proc. of the 1st Int. Workshop on Epigenetic Robotics: Modeling Cognitive Development in Robotic Systems, Lund, Sweden, Lund University Cognitive Studies, vol. 85, 2001, pp. 75–93
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Homeostasis and soft robotics in the design of feeling machines
Man, K., & Damásio, A. R. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0103-7 · Cited by 174
What nervous systems do: early evolution, input–output, and the skin brain thesis
Keijzer, F., van Duijn, M., & Lyon, P. (2013) · Adaptive Behavior · doi:10.1177/1059712312465330 · Cited by 181
Semantic information, autonomous agency and non-equilibrium statistical physics
Kolchinsky, A., & Wolpert, D. H. (2018) · Interface Focus · doi:10.1098/rsfs.2018.0041 · Cited by 163
On the Role of Social Interaction in Individual Agency
Jaegher, H. D., & Froese, T. (2009) · Adaptive Behavior · doi:10.1177/1059712309343822 · Cited by 147
Self-citationWhere There is Life There is Mind: In Support of a Strong Life-Mind Continuity Thesis
Kirchhoff, M. D., & Froese, T. (2017) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e19040169 · Cited by 114
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Froese, T., & Ziemke, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Sussex (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Froese, Tom
- ORCID
- Froese, Tom
- Venue
- Artificial Intelligence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 173
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 466-500
- ISSN
- 0004-3702 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1989974095
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 176
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 6.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Sussex
- Högskolan i Skövde
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
- Keywords
- embodied AI, intentional agency, adaptivity, design principles, embodied cognition, computational theory of mind, sensemaking, autonomous agency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
