Cited by 99Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesEmotions and Moral BehaviorChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Spontaneous emotion regulation to positive and negative stimuli

Volokhov, Rachael N., Demaree, Heath A.·2010·Brain and Cognition

Abstract

The ability to regulate one's emotions is an integral part of human social behavior. One antecedent emotion regulation strategy, known as reappraisal, is characterized by cognitively evaluating an emotional stimulus to alter its emotional impact and one response-focused strategy, suppression, is aimed at reducing behavioral output. People are capable of using these specific emotion regulation strategies when instructed to do so; however, it is equally important to investigate natural and self-selected strategy use. This study was designed to determine to what extent people spontaneously regulate their emotions and the emotion regulation strategies they choose to achieve their regulatory goals. Participants were given no instructions to regulate their emotions before they were shown a negative and a positive film clip, but were instead asked afterwards about the specific strategies that they had used. Participants reported regulating their emotions more to the negative film than to the positive film. Reappraisal was more frequently selected as an emotion regulation strategy than suppression. As expected, participants with high baseline respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) adopted reappraisal strategies more than those with low RSA but, surprisingly, RSA was not associated with facial expressivity. Suggestions for future research in this relatively young field of spontaneous emotion regulation are offered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.10.015

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals with higher levels of RSA are more likely to automatically reappraise emotional stimuli.

    “Individuals with higher levels of RSA are more likely to automatically reappraise emotional stimuli (e.g., Volokhov and Demaree, 2010).”

    From Physiological feelings (2019) · cites this paper as Volokhov and Demaree, 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Volokhov, R. N., & Demaree, H. A.
Affiliations
Case Western Reserve University (US)
Corresponding author
Demaree, Heath A.
Venue
Brain and Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-06
Volume
73
Issue
1
Pages
1-6
ISSN
0278-2626 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040176003
Cited by
99
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
emotion regulation strategies, cognitive reappraisal, expressive suppression, respiratory sinus arrhythmia, facial expressivity, negative emotions, positive emotions
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Choice Behavior, Cognition, Decision Making, Emotions, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Photic Stimulation, Reference Values, Repression, Psychology, Young Adult, Respiratory Rate, Emotional Intelligence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review