Cited by 192Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Functions and MemoryHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

Executive functions and the down-regulation and up-regulation of emotion

Open access
Gyurak, Anett, Goodkind, Madeleine S., Kramer, Joel H., Miller, Bruce L., Levenson, Robert W.·2012·Cognition & Emotion

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between individual differences in executive functions (EF; assessed by measures of working memory, Stroop, trail making, and verbal fluency) and ability to down-regulate and up-regulate responses to emotionally evocative film clips. To ensure a wide range of EF, 48 participants with diverse neurodegenerative disorders and 21 older neurologically normal ageing participants were included. Participants were exposed to three different movie clips that were designed to elicit a mix of disgust and amusement. While watching the films they were either instructed to watch, down-regulate, and up-regulate their visible emotional responses. Heart rate and facial behaviours were monitored throughout. Emotion regulatory ability was operationalised as changes in heart rate and facial behaviour in the down- and up-regulation conditions, controlling for responses in the watch condition. Results indicated that higher verbal fluency scores were related to greater ability to regulate emotion in both the down-regulation and up-regulation conditions. This finding remained significant even after controlling for age and general cognitive functioning. No relationships were found between emotion regulation and the other EF measures. We believe these results derive from differences among EF measures, with verbal-fluency performance best capturing the complex sequence of controlled planning, activation, and monitoring required for successful emotion regulation. These findings contribute to our understanding of emotion-cognition interaction, suggesting a link between emotion-regulatory abilities and individual differences in complex executive functions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02699931.2011.557291

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adult studies have shown that executive functions, such as greater verbal fluency, are associated with greater ability to down- and up-regulate emotions.

    “Accordingly, adult studies have shown that executive functions, such as greater verbal fluency, are associated with greater ability to down-and up-regulate emotions (Gyurak et al., 2009, Gyurak et al., 2012).”

    From Neurocognitive bases of emotion regulation development in adolescence (2015) · cites this paper as Gyurak et al., 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Baddeley A 1986 Working memory New York, NY, US Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press
  2. Lezak MD Howieson DB Loring DW Hannay HJ Fischer JS 2004 Neuropsychological assessment 4 New York, NY, US Oxford University Press
  3. Obrist PA 1981 Cardiovascular Psycholphysiology: A Perspective Plenum Press NY
  4. Tikofsky RS Hellman RS Parks RW 1993 Single photon emission computed tomography and applications to dementia New York, NY, US Oxford University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gyurak, A., Goodkind, M. S., Kramer, J. H., Miller, B. L., & Levenson, R. W.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Levenson, Robert W.
Venue
Cognition & Emotion
Published
2012-01
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
103-118
ISSN
  • 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0600
OpenAlex
W2136364456
Cited by
192
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognition & Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5t32mh020006-19)
  • National Institute on Aging (R37AG017766, R01AG041762, R01AG022983, AG017766-01A1, AG019724-050003, AG019724-01A1, P01AG019724)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH020006))
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
executive function, emotion regulation, verbal fluency, individual differences, emotion-cognition interaction, heart rate, facial expressions, disgust, amusements, neurodegenerative diseases, older adults, working memory, Stroop task, Trail Making Test
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Emotions, Facial Expression, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Individuality, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Middle Aged, Photic Stimulation, Social Control, Informal, Trail Making Test, Verbal Behavior, Case-Control Studies, Executive Function, Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration, Stroop Test

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review