Cited by 505Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Moving beyond mindfulness: defining equanimity as an outcome measure in meditation and contemplative research

Open access
Desbordes, Gaëlle, Gard, Tim, Hoge, Elizabeth A., Hölzel, Britta K., Kerr, Catherine, Lazar, Sara W., Olendzki, Andrew, Vago, David R.·2015·Mindfulness

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

In light of a growing interest in contemplative practices such as meditation, the emerging field of contemplative science has been challenged to describe and objectively measure how these practices affect health and well-being. While “mindfulness” itself has been proposed as a measurable outcome of contemplative practices, this concept encompasses multiple components, some of which, as we review here, may be better characterized as equanimity. Equanimity can be defined as an even-minded mental state or dispositional tendency toward all experiences or objects, regardless of their origin or their affective valence (pleasant, unpleasant, or neutral). In this article, we propose that equanimity be used as an outcome measure in contemplative research. We first define and discuss the inter-relationship between mindfulness and equanimity from the perspectives of both classical Buddhism and modern psychology and present existing meditation techniques for cultivating equanimity. We then review psychological, physiological, and neuroimaging methods that have been used to assess equanimity either directly or indirectly. In conclusion, we propose that equanimity captures potentially the most important psychological element in the improvement of well-being, and therefore should be a focus in future research studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-013-0269-8

Cites

167 of 167 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lundman et al.'s equanimity items missed the central concept of non-reactivity.

    “However, equanimity items captured present focus, acceptance and an optimistic approach, all of which represent either part or peripheral aspects of equanimity and do not capture its entirety, missing the central concept of non-reactivity which is proposed by Hadash et al. (2016) and others (Cayoun 2011; Desbordes et al. 2015; Hart 1987).”

    From Development and Validation of the Equanimity Scale-16 (2021) · cites this paper as Desbordes et al. 2015

    In “Self-Report Measures of Equanimity” (page unavailable), Desbordes et al. criticize Lundman et al.’s items for conflating constructs and their definition for failing to distinguish equanimity from apathy. The paper treats reduced reactivity as important to equanimity, but does not specifically say that Lundman’s items omit non-reactivity. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Paying attention mindfully is proposed to facilitate disengagement from an emotion-provoking stimulus by attenuating the peak amplitude and speeding up recovery, thereby decreasing the overall emotional response.

    “Paying attention mindfully is proposed to facilitate disengagement from an emotion-provoking stimulus by attenuating the peak amplitude and speeding up recovery, thereby decreasing the overall emotional response [9].”

    From Self-Reported Trait Mindfulness and Affective Reactivity: A Motivational Approach Using Multiple Psychophysiological Measures (2015) · cites this paper as [9]

    In “Equanimity Impacts the Time Course of Emotional Responses” (page unavailable), the paper proposes faster disengagement and a quicker return to baseline. It treats reduced response magnitude as a possibility for some emotions, not a necessary attenuation of peak amplitude; it even allows for a similar initial response. The claim therefore overstates that part of the proposed mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Equanimity is suggested to be an important mechanism in MBIs.

    “equanimity is suggested to be an important mechanism in these interventions (Cayoun 2011; Desbordes et al. 2015).”

    From Development and Validation of the Equanimity Scale-16 (2021) · cites this paper as Desbordes et al. 2015

  • The two factors identified in the present study are consistent with existing conceptualizations of equanimity.

    “The two factors identified in the present study are also consistent with existing conceptualizations of equanimity (Desbordes et al. 2015; Hadash et al. 2016; Hart 1987).”

    From Development and Validation of the Equanimity Scale-16 (2021) · cites this paper as Desbordes et al. 2015

  • Mindfulness is thought to facilitate the development of dispositional nonreactivity.

    “Thus, mindfulness is thought to facilitate the development of dispositional nonreactivity [9].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 172 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Desbordes, G., Gard, T., Hoge, E. A., Hölzel, B. K., Kerr, C., Lazar, S. W., Olendzki, A., & Vago, D. R.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • Brown University (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Desbordes, Gaëlle
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2014-01-21
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
356-372
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W2075305762
Cited by
505
References
172
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 6
FWCI
36.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • MindRxiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (K23AT004432, R21AT003425, K01AT008225, R01AT006344)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
equanimity, meditation, contemplative science, outcome measures, well-being, Buddhist psychology, meditation techniques, emotional valence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review