Cited by 61Language Development and DisordersNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismHemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience

Paralinguistic processing in children with callosal agenesis: Emergence of neurolinguistic deficits

Brown, Warren S., Symingtion, Melissa, VanLancker-Sidtis, Diana, Dietrich, Rosalind, Paul, Lynn K.·2005·Brain and Language

Abstract

Recent research revealed impaired processing of both nonliteral meaning and affective prosody in adults with agenesis of the corpus callosum (ACC) and normal intelligence. Since normal children have incomplete myelination of the corpus callosum, it was hypothesized that paralanguage deficits in children with ACC would be less apparent relative to their peers. The Familiar and Novel Language Comprehension Test (FANL-C) and Prosody Test were given to 18 children with ACC and normal intelligence and 17 controls matched for age (7-13 years), education, and IQ (83-122). When controlling for age, children with ACC were significantly poorer in comprehension of the precise meaning of both literal and nonliteral items on the FANL-C. Adults with ACC had previously been shown to have difficulty only on nonliteral items. The effect size for nonliteral comprehension in children with ACC was smaller than that seen in adults. There was only a trend for the child ACC group to perform worse on the recognition of affective prosody. Thus, while deficits in paralinguistic processing were apparent, children with ACC were not as clearly different from age peers as adults, and were equally deficient at comprehending literal and nonliteral expressions. The differences in results between adults and children with ACC are thought to reflect incomplete callosal development in normal children, and the importance of the corpus callosum in the early stages of the development of the ability to process literal language.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.09.003

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The results are consistent with evidence from investigations of individuals with agenesis of the corpus callosum.

    “Results reported here are consistent with evidence from investigations examining individuals with agenesis of the CC, pointing to the role that this structure plays in complex brain functions.”

    From A Meta-Analysis of the Corpus Callosum in Autism (2009) · cites this paper as [48]

  • Several cognitive and social deficits observed in autism have also been described in individuals with agenesis of the corpus callosum.

    “Several cognitive and social deficits observed in autism have also been described in individuals with agenesis of the CC, although not all individuals with these deficits meet full DSM-IV-TR criteria for autistic disorder.”

    From A Meta-Analysis of the Corpus Callosum in Autism (2009) · cites this paper as [48]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Heilman, K. M., Scholes, R., & Watson, R. T. (1975). Auditory affective agnosia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 38 , 69 - 72.
  2. Schieffer, B., Paul, L. K., & Brown, W. S. (1998). Deficits in complex problem solving in agenesis of the corpus callosum (Abstract). Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 4 , 20.
  3. Tucker, D. M. (1981). Lateralized brain function, emotion speech: Neurolinguistic studies. Psychological Bulletin, 89 , 19 - 46.
  4. Van Lancker, D., Pachana, N., Cummings, J., Sidtis, J., & Erickson, C. (1996). Dysprosodic speech following basal ganglia stroke: Role of frontosubcortical circuits. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2 , 5.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, W. S., Symingtion, M., VanLancker-Sidtis, D., Dietrich, R., & Paul, L. K.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Brown, Warren S.
Venue
Brain and Language
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-05
Volume
93
Issue
2
Pages
135-139
ISSN
0093-934X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049408535
Cited by
61
References
29
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain and Language (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
Keywords
agenesis of the corpus callosum, emotional prosody, language comprehension, children
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Affect, Child, Corpus Callosum, Dominance, Cerebral, Female, Humans, Language Development Disorders, Male, Nerve Fibers, Myelinated, Peer Group, Psycholinguistics, Reference Values, Speech Acoustics, Speech Perception, Comprehension, Agenesis of Corpus Callosum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review