Cited by 126Stress Responses and CortisolNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorTreatment of Major Depression

Effects of fluoxetine on behavioral deficits evoked by chronic social stress in rats

RYGULA, R, ABUMARIA, N, DOMENICI, E, HIEMKE, C, FUCHS, E·2006·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

Recently, we described an advanced model of chronic social stress in male rats based on the resident intruder paradigm. In this model, rats subjected to daily social stress for 5 weeks showed behavioral changes resembling anhedonia and motivational deficits in humans. In the present study, male Wistar rats were subjected to 5 weeks of daily social defeat by an aggressive conspecific and concomitant treatment with the antidepressant drug fluoxetine (10 mg/kg) after the first week of stress. Compared with controls, rats exposed to chronic stress had significantly reduced locomotor and exploratory activity (rearing and sniffing) and diminished preference for sucrose solution. These effects were paralleled by decreased body weight gain, increased adrenal weights and decreased plasma levels of testosterone measured post mortem. The stress-induced effects on locomotor activity and rearing behavior were counteracted by fluoxetine treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.07.017

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Repeated exposures to social defeat stress in rodents cause a robust depression-like phenotype marked by anhedonia, anxiety and social-avoidance behaviors.

    “Repeated exposures to social defeat stress in rodents, for example, cause a robust depression-like phenotype marked by anhedonia, anxiety and social-avoidance behaviors10,14–17.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
RYGULA, R., ABUMARIA, N., DOMENICI, E., HIEMKE, C., & FUCHS, E.
Affiliations
  • German Primate Center (DE)
  • GlaxoSmithKline (Italy) (IT)
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Corresponding author
FUCHS, E
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-11-01
Volume
174
Issue
1
Pages
188-192
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2122479540
Cited by
126
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento) (submittedVersion)
  • GRO (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
fluoxetine, chronic social stress, social defeat, resident-intruder paradigm, anhedonia, motivational deficits, locomotor activity, exploratory behavior, sucrose preference, weight gain, adrenal weight, testosterone, antidepressant treatment, rats
MeSH terms
Adrenal Glands, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Behavioral Symptoms, Body Weight, Exploratory Behavior, Fluoxetine, Food Preferences, Male, Motor Activity, Stress, Psychological, Testosterone, Rats, Wistar, Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review