Cited by 8Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesSchizophrenia research and treatment

Dissociation of prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens dopaminergic systems in conditional learning in rats

Open access
George, David N., Jenkins, Trisha A., Killcross, Simon·2011·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

There is converging evidence that the prefrontal and mesolimbic dopaminergic (DAergic) systems are involved in the performance of a variety of tasks that require the use of contextual, or task-setting, information to select an appropriate response from a number of candidate responses. Performance on tasks of this nature are impaired in schizophrenia and in rats exposed to psychotomimetics; impairments that are often attenuated by administration of dopamine (DA) antagonists. Rats were trained on either a complex instrumental discrimination task, that required the use of task-setting cues, or a simple discrimination task that did not. Following training, microdialysis probes were implanted unilaterally in either the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) or nucleus accumbens (NAc) and samples were collected in freely moving animals during a behavioural test session. In Experiment 1, we found no difference in levels of DA in the mPFC of rats while they were performing the two discrimination tasks. Rats that performed the complex task did, however, show significantly higher mPFC DA levels relative to rats in the simple discrimination condition following the end of the behavioural test session. In Experiment 2, rats performing the conditional discrimination showed lower levels of DA in the NAc compared to the simple discrimination group both during the test session and after it. These results provide direct evidence that conditional discrimination tasks engage frontal and mesolimbic DAer…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.06.028

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
George, D. N., Jenkins, T. A., & Killcross, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Hull (GB)
  • RMIT University (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
George, David N.
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-11
Volume
225
Issue
1
Pages
47-55
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2124030834
Cited by
8
References
4
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
prefrontal cortex, nucleus accumbens, dopaminergic system, conditional discrimination, cognitive control, schizophrenia, mesolimbic dopamine system, dopamine release, psychotomimetics
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Conditioning, Operant, Discrimination, Psychological, Dopamine, Electrochemistry, Male, Nucleus Accumbens, Prefrontal Cortex, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review