Cited by 44Neurological Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

Prefrontal cortex stroke induces delayed impairment in spatial memory

Zhou, Lisa Y.Y., Wright, Tim E., Clarkson, Andrew N.·2016·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

Stroke is the leading cause of long-term disability. Little is known about the effects of stroke on cognitive deficits. The subtle nature of cognition and its respective domains in areas such as working memory and attention can make this difficult to diagnose and treat. We aimed to establish a model of focal ischemia that targets the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and induce memory impairments. Stroke and sham mice were assessed at one and four-weeks post-stroke on various tests: open-field task to assess activity; grid-walk and cylinder task to assess motor impairments; elevated plus maze to assess anxiety; novel-object and object-location recognition tasks to assess memory impairment. Stroke mice in the open-field showed a small increase in activity with no effects on gross motor tasks or anxiety levels (P ≥ 0.05) at one and four-weeks post-stroke. Assessment of stroke mice on the novel object task showed no differences at either one or four-weeks compared to sham mice (P ≥ 0.05). However, assessment of stroke mice on the object-location recognition task revealed a significant (P ≥ 0.05) impairment in spatial memory by four-weeks compared to controls. Further, we show that stroke results in a small decrease in volume of the medial dorsal nucleus of the thalamus (P ≥ 0.05). This is the first evidence that demonstrates stroke to the PFC results in delayed onset impairment in spatial memory, similar to findings in human epidemiological data. We suggest that this model may be a useful tool in assessing potential rehabilitative/cognitive therapies after stroke.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.08.022

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, L. Y. Y., Wright, T. E., & Clarkson, A. N.
Affiliations
  • Brain Research New Zealand (NZ)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Clarkson, Andrew N.
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
296
Pages
373-378
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1125777540
Cited by
44
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Otago Masters Scholarship (TEW)
  • Royal Society of New Zealand Marsden Fund
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
stroke, prefrontal cortex, spatial memory impairment, focal cerebral ischemia, novel object recognition, mediodorsal thalamus, cognitive impairment, mouse stroke model, stroke rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Brain Ischemia, Disease Models, Animal, Male, Memory Disorders, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Time Factors, Prefrontal Cortex, Stroke, Mediodorsal Thalamic Nucleus, Mice, Spatial Memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review