Cited by 19Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory Processes and Influences

Spatial information is preferentially processed by the distal part of CA3: implication for memory retrieval

Flasbeck, Vera, Atucha, Erika, Nakamura, Nozomu H., Yoshida, Motoharu, Sauvage, Magdalena M.·2018·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

For the past decades, CA3 was considered as a single functional entity. However, strong differences between the proximal (close to the dentate gyrus) and the distal (close to CA2) parts of CA3 in terms of connectivity patterns, gene expression and electrophysiological properties suggest that it is not the case. We recently showed that proximal CA3 (together with distal CA1) preferentially deals with non-spatial information [1]. In contrast to proximal CA3, distal CA3 mainly receives and predominantly projects to spatially tuned areas. Here, we tested if distal CA3 preferentially processes spatial information, which would suggest a segregation of the spatial information along the proximodistal axis of CA3. We used a high-resolution imaging technique based on the detection of the expression of the immediate-early gene Arc, commonly used to map activity in the medial temporal lobe. We showed that distal CA3 is strongly recruited in a newly designed delayed nonmatching-to-location task with high memory demands in rats, while proximal CA3 is not. These results indicate a functional segregation of CA3 that mirrors the one reported in CA1, and suggest the existence of a distal CA3- proximal CA1 spatial subnetwork. These findings bring further evidence for the existence of 'specialized' spatial and non-spatial subnetworks segregated along the proximodistal axis of the hippocampus and put forward the 'segregated' view of information processing in the hippocampus as a reasonable alternative to the well-accepted 'integrated' view, according to which spatial and non-spatial information are systematically integrated in the hippocampus to form episodic memory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2018.07.023

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flasbeck, V., Atucha, E., Nakamura, N. H., Yoshida, M., & Sauvage, M. M.
Affiliations
  • Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
  • Hyogo Medical University (JP)
  • German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DE)
  • Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences (DE)
Corresponding author
Sauvage, Magdalena M.
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
354
Pages
31-38
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4240666305
Cited by
19
References
65
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
Mercator Stiftung and the SonderforschungBereich
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
CA3, spatial data processing, memory retrieval, Arc expression, CA1, episodic memory, hippocampal connectivity, rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review