Cited by 172Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityBlockchain Technology in Education and LearningPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection

Blockchain-enabled decentralized identity management: The case of self-sovereign identity in public transportation

Open access
Stockburger, Lukas, Kokosioulis, Georgios, Mukkamala, Alivelu, Mukkamala, Raghava Rao, Avital, Michel·2021·Blockchain: Research and Applications

Abstract

Identity management has been ripe for disruption over the past few years due to recurring incidents of data breaches that have led to personal information leaks and identity theft. The rise of blockchain technology has paved the way for the development of self-sovereign identity (SSI)—a new class of user-controlled resilient identity management systems that are enabled by distributed ledger technology. This paper examines how SSI management can be used in a public transportation sector that spans different operators in multiple countries. Specifically, the paper explores how a blockchain-based decentralized identity management system can draw on the SSI framework to provide high-level security and transparency for all involved parties in public transportation ecosystems. Accordingly, building on analyses of the existing public transportation ticketing solutions, we elicited requirements of a comparable system based on the SSI principles. Next, we developed a low-fidelity prototype to showcase how passengers can utilize standardized travel credentials that are valid across different transportation networks in Europe. The proposed system eliminates the need for multiple travel cards (i.e., one for each transportation provider) and empowers individuals to have better control over the use of their identities while they utilize interoperable ticketing systems across Europe. Overall, building on the public transportation case, we offer a proof-of-concept that shows how individuals can better manage their identity credentials via the SSI framework.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bcra.2021.100014

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Decentralized identity usually relies on some form of decentralized ledger technology (DLT), blockchain, distributed file system, or another decentralized system, such as Hashgraphes and Tangle.

    “And usually relies on some form of decentralized ledger technology (DLT), blockchain, distributed file system, or another decentralized system, such as Hashgraphes and Tangle [12].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stockburger, L., Kokosioulis, G., Mukkamala, A., Mukkamala, R. R., & Avital, M.
Affiliations
Copenhagen Business School (DK)
Corresponding author
Avital, Michel
Venue
Blockchain: Research and Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-06
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
100014
ISSN
2096-7209 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3164114180
Cited by
172
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
21.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Blockchain Research and Applications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Keywords
self-sovereign identity, decentralized identity management, blockchain, public transport, ticketing systems, identity theft, data breaches, distributed ledger technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review